Talk:accordion-player
RFV discussion: February–April 2016
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
This WurdSnatcher entry has replaced the deleted accordion player. Why? What makes the difference? A hyphen? Donnanz (talk) 11:18, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- delete --Hekaheka (talk) 08:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- This is RFV. We seek attesting quotations here per WT:ATTEST. If the charge is made that this is a sum of parts, WT:RFD is the venue. A vote "delete" can at best be understood as an indication what would happen in RFD. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:43, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- The entry has quotations, but the point is that they could have just as easily been found for accordion player, which was deleted in spite of its presence in Oxford . And why was a hyphen considered necessary? Donnanz (talk) 11:17, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- I would prefer to see the restoration of accordion player instead of this. Donnanz (talk) 11:34, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, the hyphenated form is vanishingly rare. SemperBlotto (talk) 11:38, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as an alternative form of an rfd-failed entry. Nominating something for rfv doesn't make it immune to other deletion criteria. Renard Migrant (talk) 20:31, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy delete is frowned on, unless the entry was created in error. It was created deliberately, along with similar entries. Donnanz (talk) 20:46, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Then let's move this to RFD. I don't believe a hyphen is any protection for SOP issues. Kiwima (talk) 18:51, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy delete is frowned on, unless the entry was created in error. It was created deliberately, along with similar entries. Donnanz (talk) 20:46, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as an alternative form of an rfd-failed entry. Nominating something for rfv doesn't make it immune to other deletion criteria. Renard Migrant (talk) 20:31, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, the hyphenated form is vanishingly rare. SemperBlotto (talk) 11:38, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- This is RFV. We seek attesting quotations here per WT:ATTEST. If the charge is made that this is a sum of parts, WT:RFD is the venue. A vote "delete" can at best be understood as an indication what would happen in RFD. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:43, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- RFV closed as out of scope: this is easily attested. I created WT:RFD#accordion-player. --Dan Polansky (talk) 06:15, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
2016 deletion discussion
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Some people think this is a sum of parts. See also Talk:accordion player.
As for myself, abstain. --Dan Polansky (talk) 06:14, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Reinstate accordion player, which should never have been deleted. Moved from RFV? Donnanz (talk) 10:43, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. I won't rehash the argument because we've had it so many times. Equinox ◑ 14:10, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 05:58, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. --WikiTiki89 14:45, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete No compelling keep argument. DCDuring TALK 17:47, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted. bd2412 T 18:14, 23 September 2016 (UTC)