Talk:he or she

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

Forms like he/she are unbroken by spaces, and so arguably single words, but if a person votes to keep this entry, ] ] ] should explain why. I see it as three words used with their usual meanings. - -sche (discuss) 21:31, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

See WT:COALMINE for the applicable vote. DCDuring TALK 21:59, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

OTOH, if he/she and s/he are abbreviations and not themselves words, I wouldn't think COALMINE applicable. IOW, in the face of ambiguity we might have to make a decision. DCDuring TALK 22:01, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Ah, I didn't think of COALMINE because we have no entry for heorshe (and I argue COALMINE applies only if heorshe is created and cited) — but heorshe is attested. - -sche (discuss) 22:26, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

"Heorshe" is such a weird, self-conscious, modern form that it's hard to consider it as the same thing as the natural three-word construct "he or she". Equinox ◑ 22:35, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

That's a reason to keep ], isn't it — so ] can point to it? - -sche (discuss) 22:39, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

I hadn't even seen "heorshe" before tonight. If it's genuinely common and attestable, then I suppose it mandates an entry for "he or she". Equinox ◑ 22:42, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

FWIW, I'd never heard of it, either (hence I never thought of COALMINE). - -sche (discuss) 22:49, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Keep per http://nz.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110122011404AAn71N8, regardless of whether COALMINE is found to apply. —Ruakh_TALK 22:42, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Why? What am I missing? Equinox ◑ 22:51, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Good point, Ruakh. "He" cannot become pregnant, unless "he" is unmarked ("man gives live birth and breastfeeds his young"), in which case "or she" is superfluous. - -sche (discuss) 22:53, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

A transman can become pregnant, so this doesn't really apply. —CodeCat 19:44, 27 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Can, and have; and since the question was hypothetical, it's also possible that the asker was taking into account future medical breakthroughs; but do you really think that that's why (s)he used "he or she"? —Ruakh_TALK 02:59, 28 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

• Keep : he/she is generally pronounced as he or she, so it is a coal mine. — TAKASUGI Shinji (talk) 09:13, 27 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Not sure that's good enough, but heorshe is, so keep.​—msh210℠ (talk) 19:33, 27 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
    • Delete. The coalmine vote only applies for alternative forms. heorshe can't really be said to be just an alternative form of he or she, it's a contraction that was created on purpose to be a gender-neutral pronoun. —CodeCat 19:42, 27 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
      • A contraction isn't an alternative form? ---> Tooironic 22:03, 27 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
        • It depends on whether it's still perceived as such. alone is a contraction of all one but it's not thought of as a contraction anymore. It seems that heorshe was created with the purpose of having a single word that's separate from its compound parts. —CodeCat 22:12, 27 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
      • Whether or not heorshe is its own pronoun, he/she certainly is an alternative form of he or she. Weak keep. ~ Robin 22:53, 27 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'd argue heorshe because I don't like the use of Usenet for citation of spelling. Coalmine is weakly applied with he/she. Regardless, there may be good enough reason to keep. DAVilla 05:01, 13 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

kept -- Liliana • 19:30, 15 November 2011 (UTC)Reply