Talk:j'ai

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:j'ai. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:j'ai, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:j'ai in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:j'ai you have here. The definition of the word Talk:j'ai will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:j'ai, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


j'ai

Same reasons as #n'est. Is simply j' + ai. --Keene 15:34, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Keep j'ai, keep n'est. Also keep au, du, and des, as well as al and similar. —Stephen 18:06, 16 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Delete - we've tended to delete contractions in English. --EncycloPetey 02:28, 17 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Since we’re native speakers of English, it’s not so important to have English contractions (although we should). Those of us who do not know much French, Spanish, Portuguese or Italian might actually wish to find out what some of these very common words mean. —Stephen 06:24, 17 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Isn't j'ai pretty much a match for I've? We wouldn't get rid of that one, I'm sure. Of course, the difference is that you could write "I have" instead of I've, but you can't write "je ai" instead of j'ai, as it would be incorrect. bd2412 T 15:53, 17 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Keep per these examples. DAVilla 01:04, 16 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Keep. Very common. And anyway, a contracted word is still a single word and so we should have an entry for it. The definition only has to say "contraction of je + ai", I don't see the problem. Widsith 11:15, 17 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Of course keep - ALL words in ALL languages. SemperBlotto 11:17, 17 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Weak delete. This is SOP, with (deprecated template usage) j'- being one of its parts. The comparison to (deprecated template usage) I've is flawed, because (deprecated template usage) -'ve is mostly restricted to a handful of contractions, usually being written (deprecated template usage) have in other cases (even when pronounced Template:IPchar), whereas (deprecated template usage) j'- is simply a form of (deprecated template usage) je used in a broad swath of contexts. However, it does look like a word to English speakers, and it's incredibly common, so I'm not going to be all militant about it. —RuakhTALK 00:39, 18 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Keep, in case my comment above does not clearly convey my direction. I would agree with deleted, for example, j'attends or j'apparais, even though they are correct, because they are just not as fundamental to the language; but avoir is one of the two basic combining forms for creating compound tenses, and j'ai is therefore exceedingly common in French speech. bd2412 T 03:48, 22 January 2008 (UTC)Reply