Template talk:RQ:Locke Human Understanding

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Template talk:RQ:Locke Human Understanding. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Template talk:RQ:Locke Human Understanding, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Template talk:RQ:Locke Human Understanding in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Template talk:RQ:Locke Human Understanding you have here. The definition of the word Template talk:RQ:Locke Human Understanding will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTemplate talk:RQ:Locke Human Understanding, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Template:RQ:Locke Human Understanding

Discussion moved from User talk:Sgconlaw.

Hey. Could you add a bit to this template where the Book and Chapter can be added optionally? I don't want any stupid error messages when the Book or Chapter is missing, though, like in many other RQ templates. I tried using it on the quote at passion. And then I can probably learn how to do it, and do some copy-pasta work adding it to Template:RQ:Locke Government --Nueva normalidad (talk) 20:01, 27 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Nueva normalidad: I updated the quotation template, but am not sure whether it is what you requested. — SGconlaw (talk) 13:16, 29 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
@SGconlaw:. Yeah, thanks, it is what I wanted. I almost convinced myself I was smart enough to implement similar changes into Template:RQ:Locke Government, but was clearly wrong. If you look at hinder, I'd like that quote to link to s:Two Treatises of Government/Book I. --Nueva normalidad (talk) 09:52, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Nueva normalidad: I updated {{RQ:Locke Government}} but linked it to a scan of the original text at the Internet Archive. — SGconlaw (talk) 15:42, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply