Template talk:User SUL
Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Template talk:User SUL. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Template talk:User SUL, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Template talk:User SUL in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Template talk:User SUL you have here. The definition of the word Template talk:User SUL will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTemplate talk:User SUL, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
RFDO discussion: June 2015–January 2016
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion/Others (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Since now everyone has a global account, this box adds nothing of value. (Not that it added much before.) — Keφr 15:35, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Equinox ◑ 15:38, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
- It has two good links and also says which wikiproject the user is most active in.--Dixtosa (talk) 15:46, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
- One of the links is already at the bottom of Special:Contributions. As for the "most active project", you can just go to m:Special:CentralAuth and see for yourself. The user page links are also easily reachable from there. — Keφr 15:58, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. - -sche (discuss) 07:03, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- @-sche (or anyone else with AWB or a bot), would you be willing to orphan these (by removal, I suppose, and in the case of
{{User Wikipedia}}, by replacement as discussed below)? —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 04:35, 24 January 2016 (UTC)- Orphaned and deleted. Only
{{User Wikipedia}}remains to be dealt with. - -sche (discuss) 18:08, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- Orphaned and deleted. Only
Might as well add this to the nomination, even though I have almost no opinion on it. (What is the difference whether you use this or {{wikipedia}}?) Though note it is technically in violation of WT:UBV anyway, and as such speedy-deletable. — Keφr 15:58, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete or redirect, per nom (use
{{wikipedia}}). - -sche (discuss) 07:03, 24 July 2015 (UTC)- @-sche: Unfortunately,
{{wikipedia}}just links to w:Foo if used on User:Foo; presumably we should edit the userpages of all editors currently using this template so that it links correctly. Similarly, we should remove the other ones from userpages (as they look like they're going to fail). —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 23:02, 25 August 2015 (UTC)- Or we could just fix
{{wikipedia}}so that it does what it is expected to do. --WikiTiki89 23:42, 25 August 2015 (UTC) - My thinking was you'd just put {{wikipedia|User:Metaknowledge}} on your page. Wikitiki's idea is better. - -sche (discuss) 03:33, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Or we could just fix
- @-sche: Unfortunately,
Likewise. This is true of all users now. — Keφr 18:23, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. - -sche (discuss) 07:03, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- Orphaned (per discussion two subsections up) and deleted. - -sche (discuss) 18:03, 24 January 2016 (UTC)