Template talk:merge

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Template talk:merge. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Template talk:merge, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Template talk:merge in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Template talk:merge you have here. The definition of the word Template talk:merge will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTemplate talk:merge, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

ns switch

Each time this is misused in NS:0, it should add itself to a cleanup category and display {{see}} instead. Right? --Connel MacKenzie 15:20, 23 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

We do redirect some variants of idiomatic phrases, and between titles with digraphs and those with separate unicode characters, so this could be useful in NS:0. --Bequw τ 12:29, 25 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

RFM discussion: March 2018–October 2022

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for moves, mergers and splits (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


In an almost ridiculous turn of events, this template should itself be merged into {{rfm}}. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 08:17, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Yes, it seems like {{rfm}} should default to "suggests that this ... be moved, merged or split" and should (does?) have a parameter to specify which one, and then {{merge}} and {{move}} and {{split}} should be shells that just consist of {{rfm|type=merge}} or the like. - -sche (discuss) 17:30, 15 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Support -sche's proposal. I oppose just deleting {{merge}}, {{move}}, and {{split}}, because I appreciate the specificity they give. - excarnateSojourner (talk | contrib) 06:15, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
This should probably be done now, because I got confused looking at the template, not sure if what I was seeing was the output of the template, or an actual RFM message! —Rua (mew) 20:16, 14 May 2019 (UTC)Reply