Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Template talk:table:Solar System. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Template talk:table:Solar System, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Template talk:table:Solar System in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Template talk:table:Solar System you have here. The definition of the word Template talk:table:Solar System will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTemplate talk:table:Solar System, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Doesn't really make sense to have a list template where no language except English defines all the parameters. I think we should restrict the list to the planets + Pluto and their moons. I mean, how likely is it that a user would want to translate "Hiʻiaka" or "Xiangliu" into Arabic or Finnish? Thadh (talk) 18:50, 13 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
I could see the value of keeping pluto, but I think we could reduce it down even to just the major planets - i.e. the non-dwarf planets. We could potentially re-locate the dwarf planets to their own template, and maybe other objects to one, too, but I feel like that would be too far. My preferred option would be to trim this down to the major planets only, just axing the rest. Vininn126 (talk) 18:56, 13 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
This table is labeled as for the "planets and most likely dwarf planets". It should thus be for the planets and most likely dwarf planets. If one of you thinks no-one is going to want to know the names of the moons in Arabic, then why have the table at all? There are questions here, such as whether 'Eris' should be 'Eris' or 'Eride' in Italian; there are names of the moons in Japanese, Russian and other languages that don't use Latin script that are not the IAU forms, etc. kwami (talk) 09:10, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Either that wording should be changed (to something like "IAU planets, notable moons, Ceres, Pluto and its moons"), or else restore the Eris + Dysnomia column for the 3 universally accepted dwarfs. Eris and Dysnomia have other forms in many languages as they're both established classical names. kwami (talk) 09:41, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
