User talk:Awewewe

Greetings. FYI, in ukaž, I formated that as an inflected form:

# {{inflection of|ukázat||2|s|imp|lang=cs}}

Happy contributing. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:38, 5 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Could you please add {{Babel}} to your user page? I'd appreciate it. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:41, 5 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

pića would be a plural of piće, believing sh:pića. We format plurals as inflected form entries, and therefore, we do not provide an English translation. For instance, kočky is formatted using templates directing the reader to kočka. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:05, 5 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

In přeříznout, you have removed two senses, including one that I have supplied evidence for in the edit in which I added the sense. If you want to remove a sense from an entry, please use the WT:RFV process. As for your "I have never heard something like that": that may be true, but that alone is not a reason for removal of senses without RFV process. --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:26, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

diff: This approaches vandalism: you have removed a meaning because you do not like it even though you do not deny its existence. --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:28, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I didn't really knew about that meaning. Awewewe (talk) 21:34, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contributions so far.

If you are unfamiliar with wiki-editing, take a look at Help:How to edit a page. It is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.

These links may help you familiarize yourself with Wiktionary:

• Entry layout (EL) is a detailed policy on Wiktionary's page formatting; all entries must conform to it. The easiest way to start off is to copy the contents of an existing same-language entry, and then adapt it to fit the entry you are creating.
• Check out Language considerations to find out more about how to edit for a particular language.
• Our Criteria for Inclusion (CFI) defines exactly which words can be added to Wiktionary; the most important part is that Wiktionary only accepts words that have been in somewhat widespread use over the course of at least a year, and citations that demonstrate usage can be asked for when there is doubt.
• If you already have some experience with editing our sister project Wikipedia, then you may find our guide for Wikipedia users useful.
• If you have any questions, bring them to Wiktionary:Information desk or ask me on my talk page.
• Whenever commenting on any discussion page, please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~) which automatically produces your username and timestamp.
• You are encouraged to add a BabelBox to your userpage to indicate your self-assessed knowledge of languages.

Enjoy your stay at Wiktionary! Chuck Entz (talk) 19:29, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

I have restored the vulgar tag in rypák, which you have removed. I think it is vulgar, and so does SSJC. I will check your other removals of vulgar. When you feel something is improperly tagged as vulgar, please check with dictionaries such as SSJC. --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:32, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

For reference, SSJC for rypák is here. Our entries often link to SSJC. --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:44, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I think so too, I was too interested in that. Awewewe (talk) 21:32, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

I am confused: diff says "not vulgar". --Dan Polansky (talk) 21:42, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Just a gentle reminder that 'Pronunciation' is spelt with an i. I have corrected the typos in your created entries so far. Wyang (talk) 07:21, 2 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Yes, thank you for your notice. Awewewe (talk) 14:01, 2 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

At the very least, your entries need to have a headword line. See my edit here. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 19:49, 5 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Greetings, why did you remove "krkavec" from See also in vrána (diff)? --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:04, 17 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

I removed label "archaic" from saň in diff: I don't think so, and nor does PSJC, SSJC and SSČ. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:17, 17 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Greetings, may I enquire why you are switching commas to slashes in inflection tables, like in diff? --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:15, 17 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

I think it's more clear. I don't know if commas are used more frequently, but I found out it is used like that on Czech Wiktionary, maybe at more places, but I didn't searched for it very well. Awewewe (talk) 20:19, 17 March 2018 (UTC).Reply

I don't think it's more clear. That is, I don't think "tučňáku/tučňákovi" is clearer than "tučňáku, tučňákovi". http://prirucka.ujc.cas.cz/?slovo=p%C3%A1n has "páni, pánové". I don't think we should be switching away from comma unless there is more substantiation than "I think it's more clear". --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:22, 17 March 2018 (UTC)Reply