Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
User talk:Blaofigkok. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
User talk:Blaofigkok, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
User talk:Blaofigkok in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
User talk:Blaofigkok you have here. The definition of the word
User talk:Blaofigkok will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
User talk:Blaofigkok, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Welcome!
Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contribution so far. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- How to edit a page is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.
- Entry layout explained (ELE) is a detailed policy documenting how Wiktionary pages should be formatted. All entries should conform to this standard, the easiest way to do this is to copy exactly an existing page for a similar word.
- Our Criteria for inclusion (CFI) define exactly which words Wiktionary is interested in including. There is also a list of things that Wiktionary is not for a higher level overview.
- The FAQ aims to answer most of your remaining questions, and there are several help pages that you can browse for more information.
- We have discussion rooms in which you can ask any question about Wiktionary or its entries, a glossary of our technical jargon, and some hints for dealing with the more common communication issues.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wiktionarian! If you have any questions, bring them to the Wiktionary:Information desk, or ask me on my talk page. If you do so, please sign your posts with four tildes: ~~~~ which automatically produces your username and the current date and time.
Again, welcome! . Mglovesfun (talk) 20:52, 22 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
- This is me. I tried to edit Wikipedia with the name Downunder, but it was already taken there. Then I tried some anagrams, opposites, and misspellings, but they were all invalid names too. So did some keyboard mashing to create a username instead. I wouldn't take this account creation as any sign of abuse. But then again, maybe bipolars would think that. --Downunder 21:03, 22 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
- Please don't take the last sentence as a kind of abuse either. --Downunder 21:03, 22 January 2011 (UTC).Reply
- Or the previous line, or in fact this one. Any other comments I make here might potential be abusive though. Sigh --Downunder 21:04, 22 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
- We have a rule against "abusing multiple accounts" not "having multiple accounts". Oh, I thought it was a town in Singapore! Mglovesfun (talk) 21:05, 22 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
- Just out of curiosity, if User:Wonderfool were unblocked would you stick to that one? I am pretty sure that deleting one page doesn't merit an indef ban and having you on one account would save about 95% of my checkusers. - DaveRoss 21:15, 22 January 2011 (UTC)Reply