User talk:Djkcel

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word User talk:Djkcel. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word User talk:Djkcel, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say User talk:Djkcel in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word User talk:Djkcel you have here. The definition of the word User talk:Djkcel will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofUser talk:Djkcel, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
  • Bulleted list item
Archive
Archive
2012
2013
2014
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024

Etymology of Rus

Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Re: Special:Diff/83607674/84039516 -- please don't play fast and loose with etymologies like this, this is terribly inaccurate. There is absolutely no way (Old) Czech Rus derives from Russian Россия (Rossija). The Czech is transparently derived from Old East Slavic Русь (Rusĭ) at some early stage, assuming some kind of (modern Russian!) affixed intermediary makes zero sense. — Mnemosientje (t · c) 10:21, 26 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Etymology of taccagno

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi,

Could you add some references for the etymology of taccagno? (and consequently also for tacaño)

We should also mention the other possibility (maybe even replace it?) that it comes from Spanish (see https://www.treccani.it/vocabolario/taccagno/ https://dizionario.internazionale.it/parola/taccagno https://xn--revistadefilologiaespaola-uoc.revistas.csic.es/index.php/rfe/article/download/911/1250/1241 ).

Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 05:36, 4 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Slavic Categorization

Latest comment: 3 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I didn't remove categorization template der was left in place. Who set up this categorization tree? proto slavic re-borrowed into protoslavic? I appreciate the nocat advice. Old Czech has a problem with such a huge time gap between between it and Proto-Slavic where the compounds could have been created. Griffon77 (talk) 17:52, 2 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Griffon77: If you're talking about Radoslav, there were two {{der}} templates, and you removed one. After your edit, the entry was in Category:Slovak terms derived from Slavic languages, Category:Proto-Slavic compound terms, and Category:Proto-Slavic terms suffixed with *-ъ- but not in Category:Slovak terms derived from Proto-Slavic. As for the "proto slavic re-borrowed into protoslavic" part, the old etymology had the text "common Slavic", but the template used was for "Slavic languages". Generally speaking, "Common " refers to the stage between the reconstructed parent "Proto-" and the development of the child branches, so having "Common Slavic" separate from "Proto-Slavic" makes perfect sense- whether that terminology occurs in the literature or not. At any rate, in that entry you only edited the Slovak (not even Old Slavic) etymology, so I don't know why you're talking about Old Czech. Chuck Entz (talk) 03:37, 3 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia