User talk:Jaspet

Welcome!

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contributions so far.

If you are unfamiliar with wiki editing, take a look at Help:How to edit a page. It is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.

These links may help you familiarize yourself with Wiktionary:

• Entry layout (EL) is a detailed policy documenting how Wiktionary pages should be formatted. All entries should conform to this standard. The easiest way to start off is to copy the contents of an existing page for a similar word, and then adapt it to fit the entry you are creating.
• Our Criteria for inclusion (CFI) define exactly which words can be added to Wiktionary, though it may be a bit technical and longwinded. The most important part is that Wiktionary only accepts words that have been in somewhat widespread use over the course of at least a year, and citations that demonstrate usage can be asked for when there is doubt.
• If you already have some experience with editing our sister project Wikipedia, then you may find our guide for Wikipedia users useful.
• The FAQ aims to answer most of your remaining questions, and there are several help pages that you can browse for more information.
• A glossary of our technical jargon, and some hints for dealing with the more common communication issues.
• If you have anything to ask about or suggest, we have several discussion rooms. Feel free to ask any other editors in person if you have any problems or question, by posting a message on their talk page.

You are encouraged to add a BabelBox to your userpage. This shows which languages you know, so other editors know which languages you'll be working on, and what they can ask you for help with.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wiktionarian! If you have any questions, bring them to the Wiktionary:Information desk, or ask me on my talk page. If you do so, please sign your posts with four tildes: ~~~~ which automatically produces your username and the current date and time.

Again, welcome! Wyang (talk) 23:09, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Cool that you are adding Chadic etymologies. Just wanted to say that :) Allahverdi Verdizade (talk) 19:44, 18 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! And I think your contributions are much cooler and more honorable.  — J​as​p​e​t 00:03, 20 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please don't create proto entries without attested descendants, even if they are cited. --{{victar|talk}} 18:16, 12 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure I comprehend. Could you elaborate on what you're referring to?

Edit: You're talking about Reconstruction:Proto-Afro-Asiatic/-t, right? Is the issue that the descendants listed on the page are only protoforms, or that they are mostly redlinks? Forgive me if I'm utterly missing some obvious point.  — J​as​p​e​t 08:23, 13 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

No, I'm referring to your Proto-Chadic entries, like this one. --{{victar|talk}} 17:08, 13 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ah well that's confusing, considering I didn't create it.  — J​as​p​e​t 19:16, 13 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

My humble apologies on that. --{{victar|talk}} 19:42, 13 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Also, if you're going to start adding Proto-Afro-Asiatic reconstructions to etymologies, be prepared to cite the heck out of those. --{{victar|talk}} 18:22, 12 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

In addition, please note that we have a zero-tolerance policy on Proto-Nostratic, and any entries or etymologies created will be subject to deletion. --{{victar|talk}} 17:08, 13 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I'm aware that the “we” you're referring to adheres to a central tenet which states “Nostratic is bogus, and anything resembling Nostratic is probably also bogus.” (Though it is puzzling that you don't have the same policy for Proto–“North Caucasian” or Proto-Niger-Congo, which are far less well established.) Though Wiktionary's consensus^(?) on them isn't quite so “zero-tolerance” as you suggest, there are of course very high standards for the inclusion of Nostratic and similar contestable macrofamilies, as there should be. In any case I don't plan to create any such entries or add Nostratic etymologies. And your warning does not apply to the userspace, so there is no issue here to discuss. My userspace appendices are not even endorsements of the theories in question.  — J​as​p​e​t 19:16, 13 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Glad to hear. Thanks. --{{victar|talk}} 19:42, 13 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Also, LOL to citing UtherPendrogn as a reference for anything. You're in good company there. --{{victar|talk}} 21:50, 14 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

LOL to thinking that I was “citing” the question and not the responses, especially that by Tropylium.  — J​as​p​e​t 01:07, 15 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

By providing links to the discussions, you're citing both, buddy, the good with the bad. I also see no support for Nostratic entries, but if you want to create a vote on it, by all means, go for it. --{{victar|talk}} 01:19, 15 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

There seem to be several points of confusion here.

• The questions themselves in the thread to which you are referring are not a source of information on any consensus, especially when you isolate and focus exclusively on them in the way you are doing.
• You are right; there is no overall support for adding Nostratic entries. This is a fact which I have not contested.
• I am not suggesting any such thing as a motion to start adding Proto-Nostratic etymologies, entries, or even an appendix of Proto-Nostratic reconstructions separate from the Reconstruction namespace (although the latter has been suggested, on numerous occasions). I am simply countering your statement from earlier. Perhaps you meant something different from what you said.  — J​as​p​e​t 01:28, 15 December 2018 (UTC)Reply