User talk:Premeditated Chaos

Please format entries according to our style, not that of Wikipedia. Here is our standard welcome. SemperBlotto 18:57, 20 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contributions so far.

If you are unfamiliar with wiki-editing, take a look at Help:How to edit a page. It is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.

These links may help you familiarize yourself with Wiktionary:

• Entry layout (EL) is a detailed policy on Wiktionary's page formatting; all entries must conform to it. The easiest way to start off is to copy the contents of an existing same-language entry, and then adapt it to fit the entry you are creating.
• Check out Language considerations to find out more about how to edit for a particular language.
• Our Criteria for Inclusion (CFI) defines exactly which words can be added to Wiktionary; the most important part is that Wiktionary only accepts words that have been in somewhat widespread use over the course of at least a year, and citations that demonstrate usage can be asked for when there is doubt.
• If you already have some experience with editing our sister project Wikipedia, then you may find our guide for Wikipedia users useful.
• If you have any questions, bring them to Wiktionary:Information desk or ask me on my talk page.
• You are encouraged to add a BabelBox to your userpage to indicate your self-assessed knowledge of languages.

Enjoy your stay at Wiktionary!

I'm quite at a loss - your username is certainly blockable by our standards, but you seem to mean well?

Please do not do the non-GFDL compliant style transwiki anymore. Simply tag it on WP with w:Template:Copy to Wiktionary and wait a few hours (up to a day.) --Connel MacKenzie 20:25, 5 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Just here to confirm that username is blockable, oh wait, no it isn't at all, Connel, you loon. Equinox ◑ 03:26, 4 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nice to have a white knight in my corner, even if you are ten years late :P Premeditated Chaos (talk) 03:34, 4 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

As I said in my deletion summary, "jarpnoonk" isn't a real English word, but probably a transliteration with a typo. I don't speak any Indian language, but "pn" strikes me as a very unlikely combination, while "ph" is a very common sound with its own letter in pretty much all of the scripts for those languages.

At any rate, when I typed "jarphoonk" into google, it suggested: झाड़ फूंक ― jhāṛ phūṅk which seems to be Hindi झाड़ (jhāṛ) + फूंक (phūṅk). My guess is it refers to "clearing the undergrowth" in the mind with a breath.

I deleted it because Wiktionary doesn't go by reliable sources, but by verifiable usage- and all I could find on Google were mentions apparently parroting that one source.

Also, conjurer strikes me as a rather dismissive POV description for any spiritual or religious figure that mercifully fell out of use decades ago in that context. Chuck Entz (talk) 20:01, 17 August 2019 (UTC)Reply