User talk:Ruzulo

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word User talk:Ruzulo. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word User talk:Ruzulo, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say User talk:Ruzulo in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word User talk:Ruzulo you have here. The definition of the word User talk:Ruzulo will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofUser talk:Ruzulo, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Welcome

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contributions so far.

If you are unfamiliar with wiki-editing, take a look at Help:How to edit a page. It is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.

These links may help you familiarize yourself with Wiktionary:

  • Entry layout (EL) is a detailed policy on Wiktionary's page formatting; all entries must conform to it. The easiest way to start off is to copy the contents of an existing same-language entry, and then adapt it to fit the entry you are creating.
  • Check out Language considerations to find out more about how to edit for a particular language.
  • Our Criteria for Inclusion (CFI) defines exactly which words can be added to Wiktionary; the most important part is that Wiktionary only accepts words that have been in somewhat widespread use over the course of at least a year, and citations that demonstrate usage can be asked for when there is doubt.
  • If you already have some experience with editing our sister project Wikipedia, then you may find our guide for Wikipedia users useful.
  • If you have any questions, bring them to Wiktionary:Information desk or ask me on my talk page.
  • Whenever commenting on any discussion page, please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~) which automatically produces your username and timestamp.
  • You are encouraged to add a BabelBox to your userpage to indicate your self-assessed knowledge of languages.

Enjoy your stay at Wiktionary!

Saluton! Jonathan Webley 16:45, 25 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Citations

Nice work, keep at it. Mglovesfun (talk) 06:47, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Question about the citation for eraris: Is there a translator to credit? A publication? A date is not enough to identify a source for a citation. --EncycloPetey 03:40, 11 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. I've formatted the quotation to more usual standards, although we don't have a set way to cite the name of the translator (as far as I know). We do put the date first in bold, and try to avoid abbreviations (even for page). We also bold both the word being demonstrated, as well as its translation. Translations are usually set inside quotation marks, but that's not universal. If you plan to add a lot of translations, I suggest keeping a list of model pages to refer to, or creating some models somehwere. I found that doing so helped me a lot when I was first learning Wiktionary format. If there are specific sources that you plan to quote from heavily, it is also possible to set up a template for that source to save on typing. We have conventions for naming these, but once you learn the basics, it's easy to understand. --EncycloPetey 05:12, 11 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Citations:Schadenfreude

Those don't qualify for inclusion as citations of the English word, since the quotations explicitly call the term "German". The word needs to be used in English, and not discussed as a foreign word. --EncycloPetey 23:25, 20 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Citations and lemmas

The lemma form, where the definition is, is also where we put citations for all inflected forms, because they all serve to support the lemma. We only put citations on inflected forms if there is any doubt they they exist, or exist in that form. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 18:50, 24 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

I don't think there is any consensus for that. I think accuracy in reporting about what "we" do is quite important, and would like to ask everyone to lift their standards as high as possible as far as that. In case of doubt, phrasing like "I prefer X since Y" is preferable. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:53, 25 June 2016 (UTC)Reply