. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
you have here. The definition of the word
will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Our entry for lunchpail has this quotation, from The New York Times:
- Ortmeyer, a lunchpail forward who usually counts success in hits and blocked shots, was heading into his third season with the Rangers and was floored by the news.
The term is defined as:
- Alternative spelling of lunch pail.
The meaning given for the latter is:
- A lunchbox (food container) shaped more or less like a bucket with a handle.
So can we conclude that Ortmeyer is shaped more or less like a bucket with a handle? --Lambiam 19:52, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Apparently the Boston Bruins team of 1978-85 garnered the nickname "Lunch Pail Athletic Club" and were known for "their charisma, camaraderie and most notably, their signature grit" (source: NHL.com and bostonhockeynow.com). Maybe the author describes Mr Ortmeyer as a "lunchpail" player on account of his exhibiting similar qualities. Voltaigne (talk) 23:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- My guess is that it refers to the concept of packing a lunch from home rather than eating at some fancy restaurant. It probably means the person is unpretentious, down-to-earth and hardworking. Chuck Entz (talk) 02:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
What is the way to link to a specific definition, e.g. that of sharpness in the meaning of "intellectualy sharp"? Garethphua (talk) 01:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- To do this you first need to tag the specific sense in the list of definitions you want to link to with an ID. See Template:senseid; the section Examples is probably all you need to get the idea. --Lambiam 19:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
This template in particular <https://en.wiktionary.orghttps://dictious.com/en/Template:pa-conj> I notice has quite a few errors. I don't know how to edit it as the edit page simple says invoke:pa-verb and the pa-verb template is empty too.
Also another thing, I'm not sure how to create a template. If I copy and paste the code from for example here <https://en.wiktionary.orghttps://dictious.com/en/Template:pnb-noun-m-%C4%81> onto a new page it comes out looking like just the lines of code, with no actual template format. OblivionKhorasan (talk) 08:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- In principle, most users can edit most templates. Some are protected so that only template editors can edit them. That is not the case here. Some templates are written with native MediaWiki code and many with Lua. So as long as you 1.) have the proper permissions and 2.) understand the languages, then you can edit a template. In this case, since you've noticed errors but it seems like you're not versed in template editing, it would probably be a good idea to AryamanA to see how you can collaborate on improving it. Note that Wiktionary is very template-heavy, compared to our sister wikis, so while not everyone has to know how to edit the code of the templates, it will be really difficult to contribute for most tasks without a basic understanding of how they work. See also mw:Help:Templates. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:06, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
{{#invoke:pa-verb|show}}
means that the template calls the Lua code of Module:pa-verb. The errors are in the code of this module and need to be corrected there. Perhaps they are easy to spot and have an obvious fix. More likely, they can only be found and fixed if you understand the way the code works. --Lambiam 17:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Is there any sandbox-like space here where one could try their hand at creating modules?
I'd like to start learning how to make them, but I think I can't really make any attempt at learning without creating a useless page in the meantime (as in, I believe I can't test one in a template without first saving it, but there is a really high chance of it having at the very least a few issues, so it would just be there, kind of useless, until I figure out how to do it).
If there is no such space, would it be frowned upon to create a page anyway, even with a high chance of it it being pointless for a good while? —— GianWiki (talk) 11:33, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- @GianWiki: Unlike templates, modules have to be in the Module namespace to work, so you would create it with "User:GianWiki/" in front of the name. See what others have done. You would create test templates in your user space ("User:GianWiki/foo") and either create test pages in your user space in the same way, or test them in preview in a regular page. Chuck Entz (talk) 14:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! I didn't think about that at all. —— GianWiki (talk) 17:03, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello! Wikibooks has a small Kashubian dictionary that may be deleted for being out of scope there. Before this occurs, I want to suggest that someone here add the content to Wiktionary if it would be useful. I already went through it and removed the words that exist here at Wiktionary. Cheers —Kittycataclysm (talk) 23:34, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Imported to Wiktionary:Requested entries (Kashubian)/Kashubian Dictionary and listed at Wiktionary:Requested entries (Kashubian). Thanks, KC. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- We could potentially get a copy and make a reference template for it. However, I wouldn't be surprised if most terms are already covered by our existing templates, but a new one can't hurt. I'm not sure about mass-import, Kashubian is an LDL but also there's the issue of copyright and such. Justin's page should make a good starting point. I also wonder, is that really the entire list? Vininn126 (talk) 07:39, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, all! Have you extracted all the material you need from the Wikibooks version? —Kittycataclysm (talk) 18:43, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- I haven't added the entries yet; they're still in the requested entries. Some may already exist however. Vininn126 (talk) 18:44, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Is there a reason why we don't have a category for Wikimedia slang? Always seemed like an odd exclusion Trade (talk) 06:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's not the most clearly named category (and possibly there are other super-categories that this should be a subcategory of, like the Internet slang category you mention), but words labelled as
{{lb|en|Wikimedia jargon}}
go in Category:en:Wiki. - -sche (discuss) 08:19, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
kurcalamak Zbutie3.14 (talk) 01:58, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- I deleted it and recreated it. Your IP address is no longer in the conventional edit history, but it is viewable by admins. If you really need that deleted, that will require an office action from an oversighter. I do not have those permissions. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:23, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- thank you; just removing it from edit history is enough i don’t need further than that. Zbutie3.14 (talk) 02:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
xeet was protected indefinitely as a possible vandalism target but the word has become pretty widely used since then. I would appreciate if someone with the permissions could add the definition I suggested at Wiktionary:Tea room/2024/May#xeet plus category links etc Nicerink (talk) 06:16, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Nicerink done. If you create an English entry, please add appropriate citations. See the entry turbovirgin as an example. This, that and the other (talk) 23:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)