Why the <span class="searchmatch">Policy</span> <span class="searchmatch">Initiative</span>? Wiktionary, as it stands, lacks any official <span class="searchmatch">policies</span>. This is problematic for many reasons, it makes the jobs of the sysops...
This <span class="searchmatch">policy</span> page consists of two sections: (a) <span class="searchmatch">policy</span>, the statement of binding <span class="searchmatch">policy</span>; (b) explanation, a non-binding explanation of the <span class="searchmatch">policy</span>, and...
WT:I2P This page includes various indexes to <span class="searchmatch">policies</span> in Wiktionary. This is an auto-generated list of <span class="searchmatch">policies</span> which have gone through a community consensus...
version of the Urdu alphabet; the five additional letters are ٲ, ݲ, ڇ, ڙ, and ݜ. [1] Forum for Language <span class="searchmatch">Initiatives</span> [2] Omniglot [3] Unicode proposal for ݲ...
an adapted version of the Arabic script. For information on its additional letters, see the page at the "Forum for Language <span class="searchmatch">Initiatives</span>" website: [1]...
know that the Usability <span class="searchmatch">Initiative</span> is continuing the rollout of Vector and the new editing features. The goal of this <span class="searchmatch">initiative</span> is to make it easier for...
content related to the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. This <span class="searchmatch">initiative</span> focuses on creating new articles, multimedia, structured data, and more...
actually eligible to "vote" on Wiktionary, but the thoughtfulness and <span class="searchmatch">initiative</span> Dave has exhibited gives me confidence enough to support him. Bastique...
nit-picks (which I hope don't detract from the fact that overall, I like the <span class="searchmatch">initiative</span> you have taken) here: The comment about "saving disk space" seems simply...
each specific type overwhelm the discussion, again killing the entire <span class="searchmatch">initiative</span> off. --Connel MacKenzie 04:28, 7 August 2007 (UTC) I think I made my reasons...