Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2016-05/User:RobokoBot for bot status
Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2016-05/User:RobokoBot for bot status. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2016-05/User:RobokoBot for bot status, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2016-05/User:RobokoBot for bot status in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2016-05/User:RobokoBot for bot status you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2016-05/User:RobokoBot for bot status will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/bt-2016-05/User:RobokoBot for bot status, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
User:RobokoBot for bot status
- Nomination: I hereby request the Bot flag for User:RobokoBot for the following purposes:
- Adding interwiki links using interwiki.py from the Pywikibot framework (the Wiktionary option is enabled).
After creating a Japanese entry on fr.wiktionary, I noticed that it sometimes takes a while to get updated on en.wiktionary, so I would like to help. Here's some example edits: , see also Special:Contributions/RobokoBot.
The bot is also running on the French Wikipedia and the French Wiktionary (see its SUL).
Sincerely, Thibaut120094 (talk) 03:07, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Vote starts: 03:07, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Vote ends: 23:59, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Support
Support — I don't see there being any problem with this. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 14:55, 26 May 2016 (UTC)- Support -Xbony2 (talk) 01:17, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support He has already been contributing with his bot on the French Wiktionary. — TAKASUGI Shinji (talk) 03:21, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support --WikiTiki89 18:00, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Daniel Carrero (talk) 14:36, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Oppose
Abstain
Decision
6-0-0 (100%-0%) Passes @Stephen G. Brown --Daniel Carrero (talk) 14:36, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- I think it's 5, not 6? -Xbony2 (talk) 21:24, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- My mistake. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 03:20, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
- Done. —Stephen (Talk) 15:24, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
- My mistake. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 03:20, 11 June 2016 (UTC)