You have to ask the supporters. As for what we did on 1 September 2014: Having colon (:) after the language name is a natural extension of our category...
This will be superfluous if and when Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2014-04/Keeping common misspellings passes. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:28, 24 August 2014 (UTC)...
just go ahead and change your vote. - -sche (discuss) 00:00, 18 March 2014 (UTC) Thank you. Done. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 00:09, 18 March 2014 (UTC)...
2014 (UTC) I propose that, instead of having two separate up-or-down votes, the proposal in this vote and the proposal at [[Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2014-06/Excluding...
March 2014 (UTC) Good idea. It could be "Unified Norwegian" on the model of Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-06/Unified Serbo-Croatian, Wiktionary:Votes/2011-09/Unified...
extending it one more week. :-) —msh210℠ (talk) 20:50, 10 July 2014 (UTC) How do "votes" work here? Are they numerical, or are they decided by the quality...
talk:Votes/pl-2014-06/Allowing attested romanizations#merge the votes]]; please comment there.—msh210℠ (talk) 17:19, 16 June 2014 (UTC) I think the votes...
in Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2010-03/User:MewBot for bot status for adding Dutch inflected forms. --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:19, 17 August 2014 (UTC) CodeCat's...
currently-ongoing votes. - -sche (discuss) 01:50, 28 March 2014 (UTC) Thanks. It has now been mentioned in the vote itself. Wyang (talk) 03:11, 28 March 2014 (UTC)...
merely want to codify the status quo in CFI. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:40, 5 April 2014 (UTC) The status quo hypothesis is further reaffirmed by the following...