Lower Sorbian, like most Slavic languages, has a relatively complex system of conjugation. Some forms are inflected, while others are built periphrastically.
The present tense is formed by inflection. The endings found in the present tense are as follows:
Person | Singular | Dual | Plural |
---|---|---|---|
1st | -m, -u | -mej | -my |
2d | -š | -tej | -śo |
3d | ∅ | -tej | -u, -e |
There are four conjugation classes, defined by the final letter of the third-person singular:
The preterite is found only in the literary language, and is formed by inflection. The endings found in the preterite are as follows:
Person | Singular | Dual | Plural |
---|---|---|---|
1st | -ch | -chmej | -chmy |
2d | -šo (imperfective) ∅ (perfective) |
-štej | -šćo |
3d | -šo (imperfective) ∅ (perfective) |
-štej | -chu |
The perfect is formed periphrastically by means of the present tense of byś plus the past active participle (or ł-form) of the main verb. It can have either a present perfect or a simple past meaning, e.g. ja som studował (“I studied; I have studied”). The participle agrees with the subject for number (singular, dual, or plural) and, in the singular only, for gender (masculine, feminine, or neuter). The perfect of wuknuś (“to learn”), for example, is:
Person | Singular (masculine) | Singular (feminine) | Singular (neuter) | Dual | Plural |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | ja som wuknuł | ja som wuknuła | ja som wuknuło* | mej smej wuknułej | my smy wuknuli |
2d | ty sy wuknuł | ty sy wuknuła | ty sy wuknuło* | wej stej wuknułej | wy sćo wuknuli |
3d | wón jo wuknuł | wóna jo wuknuła | wóno jo wuknuło | wónej stej wuknułej | wóni su wuknuli |
*Theoretical form, unlikely to occur in natural language. |
The perfect is the ordinary past tense of the colloquial language.
The pluperfect is found in the literary language and is formed with the preterite of byś plus the past active participle (or ł-form) of the main verb. The pluperfect of wuknuś (“to learn”), for example, is:
Person | Singular (masculine) | Singular (feminine) | Singular (neuter) | Dual | Plural |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | ja běch wuknuł | ja běch wuknuła | ja běch wuknuło* | mej běchmej wuknułej | my běchmy wuknuli |
2d | ty běšo wuknuł | ty běšo wuknuła | ty běšo wuknuło* | wej běštej wuknułej | wy běšćo wuknuli |
3d | wón běšo wuknuł | wóna běšo wuknuła | wóno běšo wuknuło | wónej běštej wuknułej | wóni běchu wuknuli |
*Theoretical form, unlikely to occur in natural language. |
The future is formed periphrastically by means of the future tense of byś (one of the few verbs to have an inflected future) plus the infinitive of the main verb. For example, the future of cytaś (“to read”) is:
Person | Singular | Dual | Plural |
---|---|---|---|
1st | ja buźom cytaś ja budu cytaś |
mej buźomej cytaś | my buźomy cytaś |
2d | ty buźoš cytaś | wej buźotej cytaś | wy buźośo cytaś |
3d | wón(a/o) buźo cytaś | wónej buźotej cytaś | wóni budu cytaś |
Besides byś, the verbs hyś, jěś, and měś have inflected futures, formed by adding a prefix (pó- for the first two, z- for the third) to the present tense.
The conditional is formed periphrastically by means of the invariable verb form by plus the past active participle (or ł-form) of the main verb, e.g. the conditional of groniś (“say”) is as follows:
Person | Singular (masculine) | Singular (feminine) | Singular (neuter) | Dual | Plural |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | ja by gronił | ja by groniła | ja by groniło* | mej by groniłej | my by gronili |
2d | ty by gronił | ty by groniła | ty by groniło* | wej by groniłej | wy by gronili |
3d | wón by gronił | wóna by groniła | wóno by groniło | mej by groniłej | my by gronili |
*Theoretical form, unlikely to occur in natural language. |
The imperative is formed only in the second person. The endings are as follows:
Person | Singular | Dual | Plural |
---|---|---|---|
2d | -j (after a vowel) ∅ (after a single consonant) -i (after two consonants) |
-tej | -ćo (after a sibilant consonant) -śo (in all other cases) |
The passive voice can be formed in a variety of ways. The most common methods are to use the reflexive pronoun se, as in Dom se pśedajo (“The house is being sold”, literally “The house is selling itself”), or to use the third-person plural impersonally, as in Su pśedali dom (“The house was sold”, literally “They sold the house”).
In a highly literary style, the passive of byś can be combined with the past passive participle of the main verb to form a past-tense passive, for example Dom bu pśedany (“The house was sold”). The complete table of forms is as follows:
Person | Singular masculine | Singular feminine | Singular neuter | Dual | Plural |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | ja buch pśedany | ja buch pśedana | ja buch pśedane* | mej buchmej pśedanej | my buchmy pśedane |
2d | ty bu pśedany | ty bu pśedana | ty bu pśedane* | wej buštej pśedanej | wy bušćo pśedane |
3d | wón bu pśedany | wóna bu pśedana | wóno bu pśedane | wónej buštej pśedanej | wóni buchu pśedane |
*Theoretical form, unlikely to occur in natural language. |
In a very casual, colloquial style, the any tense of verb wordowaś (“to become”) can be combined with the past passive participle of the main verb, for example Dom wordujo pśedany (“The house is being sold”), Dom jo wordował pśedany (“The house was sold”), Dom buźo wordowaś pśedany (“The house will be sold”). This practice is a calque of the German passive construction with werden.
Lower Sorbian has three participles:
Verbs whose infinitive does not end in -ś form the past active and past passive participle in various irregular ways.
The infinitive is the lemma form of the verb; most verbs have an infinitive ending in -ś, though some end in -sć or -c. The infinitive is chiefly used in conjunction with modal verbs, e.g. ja dejm hyś (“I ought to go”).
The supine, which is found in the spoken language only in dialects spoken north of Cottbus, and otherwise only in the literary language, is formed by replacing the -ś, -sć, or -c of the infinitive with -t, -st, or -ct respectively. The supine is used after verbs of motion or where motion is implied, e.g. Jědu k nanoju woglědat (“They’re going to visit their father”), Smej nakupowat (“We are (going) shopping”).
The verbal noun is formed by replacing the -ś of the infinitive with -nje or -śe, e.g. spiwaś (“to sing”) → spiwanje (“singing”), znaś (“to know”) → znaśe (“knowing, knowledge”). In some cases, both types are attested for the same verb, often with different meanings gójś (“to heal”) → gójśe (“healing”) and gójenje (“cure”).
Verbs are generally negated by means of the prefix nje-, which attaches to finite forms, e.g. wuknjo (“(s/he) learns”) – njewuknjo (“(s/he) does not learn”). The verbs byś (“to be”) and hyś (“to go”) take the variant njej- (njejsom (“I am not”), njejźom (“I do not go”)); the verbs móc (“can”) and měś (“to have”) take the variant nja- (njamógu (“I cannot”), njama (“(s/he) does not have”)); and the verb kśěś (“to want”) takes the variant njo- (njoco (“(s/he) does not want”)). The verb hyś (“to go”) takes njej- also in the imperative: njejźi (“don’t go”). The other verbs all take nje- in the imperative.