I'm at it, I'm going to switch the non <span class="searchmatch">Interlingua</span> bits to match the table in Appendix:<span class="searchmatch">Swadesh</span>_<span class="searchmatch">lists</span>#<span class="searchmatch">Swadesh</span>_list_table_of_Germanic_and_Romance_languages...
Appendix:<span class="searchmatch">Swadesh</span>_<span class="searchmatch">lists</span>_<span class="searchmatch">for</span>_<span class="searchmatch">interlingua</span>, and there were a number of errors there. I'm double checking everything to make sure the senses in each of <span class="searchmatch">swadesh</span> lists...
of <span class="searchmatch">Interlingua</span> which does not represent a people (<span class="searchmatch">Swadesh</span> <span class="searchmatch">lists</span> belongs to sociolinguistic!) You can make a special group "Artificial languages" <span class="searchmatch">for</span> Esperanto...
if we should think about using subpages in certain cases (the <span class="searchmatch">Swadesh</span> list and other <span class="searchmatch">lists</span>, the interlanguage question, ...). I know that Wikipedia decided...