seems redundant to me since <span class="searchmatch">proper</span> <span class="searchmatch">noun</span> can’t be any other number than singular, except pluralia tantum whose genitive <span class="searchmatch">form</span> always is identical to the...
capitalisation. So what about <span class="searchmatch">German</span>, where all <span class="searchmatch">nouns</span> are capitalised and adjectives never are, so there is no way to tell '<span class="searchmatch">properness</span>' from the spelling? —CodeCat...
conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions. Category:<span class="searchmatch">German</span> unknown gender <span class="searchmatch">nouns</span> Many <span class="searchmatch">nouns</span> in the category have a known gender: Given names of male...
languages, so we don't have Category:American English <span class="searchmatch">proper</span> <span class="searchmatch">nouns</span> or Category:Namibian <span class="searchmatch">German</span> adverbs. -- Prince Kassad 17:33, 30 November 2010 (UTC)...
they do indeed belong here. I don't see very much in this "older <span class="searchmatch">forms</span>" vs "newer <span class="searchmatch">forms</span>" business. Potato (1565), mosquito (1583), and tomato (1604/1753)...
at dee#<span class="searchmatch">Noun</span> from "The name of the Latin script letter D/d." into hundreds of definitions "A letter in English alphabet", "A letter in <span class="searchmatch">German</span> alphabet"...
at dee#<span class="searchmatch">Noun</span> from "The name of the Latin script letter D/d." into hundreds of definitions "A letter in English alphabet", "A letter in <span class="searchmatch">German</span> alphabet"...
except that descriptivists had forced it into the language <span class="searchmatch">proper</span> as an uncountable <span class="searchmatch">noun</span>, creating the conflict that now exists (though I must admit...