@Erutuon Since this module concerns <span class="searchmatch">italics</span> specifically in the context of taxonomic names, do you think it might be better named Module:taxonomy? That...
tooltip. I should probably add <span class="searchmatch">italics</span> though. — Eru·tuon 18:33, 17 April 2017 (UTC) Thanks! Yes, please add the <span class="searchmatch">italics</span> if you can. Also, I suggest that...
rendered markup, I discovered that the romanization is indeed output in <span class="searchmatch">italics</span> tags, but it's still rendered upright. Examining the CSS, I found that...
terms should suffice. Also, the practice i have seen, is to write with <span class="searchmatch">italics</span> the word dialectal and folllow with normal letters all the areas. ‑‑Sarri...
--Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 01:20, 28 January 2014 (UTC) OK, just thought <span class="searchmatch">italics</span> perhaps looked better. Rules: [1]. I am not sure about the line thing....
Perhaps it would be better to use a CSS class? AFAIK you can specify the <span class="searchmatch">italics</span> as a text style and the * as a character to display at the beginning of...
in {{l}}. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 02:19, 8 August 2013 (UTC) I don't see <span class="searchmatch">italics</span> on that page anywhere...? —CodeCat 11:01, 8 August 2013 (UTC) In the headword...
in the text “English terms suffixed with -ly”. The suffix should be in <span class="searchmatch">italics</span> (“English terms suffixed with -ly”). J3133 (talk) 00:36, 4 June 2023 (UTC)...
September 2010 (UTC) I think that the quoted text would be better presented in <span class="searchmatch">italics</span>. --Jerome Potts 18:56, 5 September 2010 (UTC) When both are present, shouldn't...
wanted to know is how I should label them as colloquial. Currently, I use <span class="searchmatch">italics</span> in parentheses, but maybe there's a special template that I should use...