Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/wáy

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/wáy. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/wáy, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/wáy in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/wáy you have here. The definition of the word Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/wáy will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofReconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/wáy, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
This Proto-Indo-European entry contains reconstructed terms and roots. As such, the term(s) in this entry are not directly attested, but are hypothesized to have existed based on comparative evidence.

Proto-Indo-European

Alternative reconstructions

Alternative forms

  • *uwáy (based on Anatolian, Indo-Iranian, Slavic forms)

Etymology

Might have been from an earlier *uwáy (to see oneself), which has been preserved in Hittite (uwai) and Sanskrit उवे (uvé). The form *wáy would then represent a later innovation. But probably of expressive origin.

Interjection

*wáy[1]

  1. oh!
  2. ah!
  3. woe!
  4. alas!

Derived terms

Descendants

  • Proto-Anatolian: *uwáy
    • Hittite: (uwai)
  • Albanian: vaj
  • Proto-Balto-Slavic: *wái, *uwái
  • Proto-Celtic: *wai (see there for further descendants)
  • Proto-Germanic: *wai (see there for further descendants)
  • >? Proto-Hellenic: *wái
  • Proto-Indo-Iranian: *wáy, *uwáy
  • Proto-Italic: *wai
    • Latin: vae (see there for further descendants)

References

  1. ^ Pokorny, Julius (1959) Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch [Indo-European Etymological Dictionary] (in German), volume 3, Bern, München: Francke Verlag, pages 1110–1111
  2. ^ Schrijver, Peter C. H. (1995) Studies in British Celtic historical phonology (Leiden studies in Indo-European; 5), Amsterdam, Atlanta: Rodopi, pages 115–116