Reconstruction:Proto-Turkic/čōk

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Reconstruction:Proto-Turkic/čōk. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Reconstruction:Proto-Turkic/čōk, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Reconstruction:Proto-Turkic/čōk in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Reconstruction:Proto-Turkic/čōk you have here. The definition of the word Reconstruction:Proto-Turkic/čōk will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofReconstruction:Proto-Turkic/čōk, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
This Proto-Turkic entry contains reconstructed terms and roots. As such, the term(s) in this entry are not directly attested, but are hypothesized to have existed based on comparative evidence.

Proto-Turkic

Etymology

Oghuz, Gagauz and Turkish point to a long vowel.[1]

Adjective

*čōk

  1. vile, hooligan
  2. many, very
    Antonym: *āŕ (few, a little)

Descendants

  • Oghuz: جُوقْ (çōk, vile, hooligan)[2]
    • Old Anatolian Turkish:
  • Kipchak:
    • South Kipchak:
      • Caspian:
        • Karakalpak: shoq (vile, hooligan)
      • Kyrgyz-Kipchak:
  • Siberian:
    • South Siberian:
      • Sayan:
        • Tuvan: (šoɣ, vile, hooligan)
      • Yenisei:
        • Khakas: (sox, vile, hooligan)


References

  1. ^ Starostin, Sergei, Dybo, Anna, Mudrak, Oleg (2003) “*čok”, in Etymological dictionary of the Altaic languages (Handbuch der Orientalistik; VIII.8), Leiden, New York, Köln: E.J. Brill
  2. ^ al-Kashgarî, Mahmud (1072–1074) Besim Atalay, transl., Divanü Lûgat-it-Türk Tercümesi [Translation of the “Compendium of the languages of the Turks] (Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları; 521) (in Turkish), 1985 edition, volume III, Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurmu Basımevi, published 1939–1943, pages 130, 280
  • Clauson, Gerard (1972) “”, in An Etymological Dictionary of pre-thirteenth-century Turkish, Oxford: Clarendon Press, page 405