10 Results found for "Reconstruction_talk:Latin".

Reconstruction talk:Latin/genuculum

conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions. Reconstruction:Latin/genuclum Unattested alternative form of geniculum. —Rua (mew) 21:11, 12...


Reconstruction talk:Latin/amo

Wiktionary:Tea_room/2017/February#Reconstruction:Latin.2Famare Wiktionary:Requests_for_deletion/Others#Reconstruction:Latin.2Famo --Barytonesis (talk) 11:05, 29 June...


Reconstruction talk:Latin/circa

but feel free to discuss its conclusions. Reconstruction:Latin/circa Attested. See circa#Latin. @Nicodene --Gowanw (talk) 20:39, 20 June 2022 (UTC) Tagging:...


Reconstruction talk:Latin/voleo

Reconstruction:Latin/voleo and Reconstruction:Latin/volere Request to undelete Reconstruction:Latin/voleo and Reconstruction:Latin/volere. They are...


Reconstruction talk:Latin/auca

Reconstruction:Latin/auca Attested (see the DMLBS); moved to auca by Brutal Russian on 4 November 2020‎ (edit summary: “attested Latin moved from Vulgar Latin”)....


Reconstruction talk:Latin/plovere

represented by *plovĕre or that represented by *plovēre. Granted, Classical Latin pluĕre, not to mention the Romance data, strongly support *plovĕre, but...


Reconstruction talk:Latin/retina

should not be re-entered without careful consideration. Reconstruction:Latin/retina Contra the provided Grandgent (1907) reference, which states, "A...


Reconstruction talk:Latin/-izo

The 12th century date for "latinizare" is given in Niermeyer's Medieval Latin Dictionary and is echoed in other sources. I can see it does appear in Aurelianus...


Reconstruction talk:Latin/sculto

careful consideration. Reconstruction:Latin/sculto Redundant to attested ausculto. See Category talk:Vulgar Latin, and especially Wiktionary:Requests_...


Reconstruction talk:Latin/accatto

careful consideration. Reconstruction:Latin/accatto Latin. @Catonif: “no reason for alt forms in reconstructed latin. classical spelling is used”. (Notifying...