still remained as such well into the Common Indo-Iranian period (even after the breakup of Proto-Indo-Iranian). @Calak Judging from the Avestan evidence...
sure Proto-Indo-European *-stH- becomes Proto-Indo-Iranian *-štʰ-, and then Proto-Iranian *-št-. That's what User:Victar/Wiktionary:About Proto-Iranian says...
currently seems to be no evidence that this would be Proto-Indo-Iranian and not simply Proto-Iranian? --Tropylium (talk) 18:23, 23 May 2017 (UTC) @Tropylium:...
—Soap— 19:20, 16 August 2020 (UTC) Pretty sure Proto-Indo-Iranian was spoken in neither India nor Iran, but rather Central Asia before the branches spread...
seem to be different. Is the correct Proto-Indo-Iranian form *Hrā́ĵā or *Hrā́ĉš ? Also, with regards to the Proto-Indo-European form, is it derived from...
endings in Proto-Indo-Iranian were using -h or -š, not -s (it invokes the Ruki rule). I think this change occurred later, in Proto-Iranian, (e.g. *sáwmas...
pr̥tHúš (with a laryngeal)? I've not seen any source that posits voiceless aspirates in Proto-Indo-Iranian. Grover cleveland (talk) 16:41, 4 May 2021 (UTC)...
inherited from Proto-Indo-Aryan for some examples. And if we didn't have root entries, where would दुग्ध (dugdha) go? There's no Iranian forms AFAICT so...
free to discuss its conclusions. Reconstruction:Proto-Iranian/rijáti, Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-Iranian/riȷ́ʰáti Firstly, the Vedic 'rihati' turned out...
conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions. Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-Iranian/wáHyati @Victar, Bhagadatta: Reconstruction with only one descendant...