I suspect that this is limited to Proto-Ryukyuan, and represents a Ryukyuan innovation from Japonic /ore/, which appears in the oldest texts as a second-person...
it difficult to accept as Proto-Japonic, rather than specific to Proto-Ryukyuan. What chance that this represents a Proto-Ryukyuan innovation, perhaps...
@Mellohi! To lemmatize Proto-Japonic verbs with 終止形 suffix -u is very bad. There are vowel stems and consonant stems in the verbs of Japonic languages, and they...
‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 08:34, 13 May 2023 (UTC) @Chuterix, since Proto-Japonic /i/ is also reflected as Japanese and Ryukyuan /i/, there is no apparent...
in Kunigami as chi- -- with the exception of Proto-Japonic *tukoru → Kunigami shikōrun, and Proto-Japonic *tukuy → Kunigami hichū. For 作る, this leads me...
@Kwékwlos, Mellohi!, YukaSylvie, anyone else involved in Proto-Japonic: Monolingual Japanese resources that list etymology derive 前 (mae, “front”) from...
this at /kua/? w:Proto-Japonic#Vowels clearly states that word-final Old Japanese /o₁/ is a reflex of Proto-Japonic /o/. Proto-Japonic /ua/ is reflected...
-kkwa. I have encountered no other sources reconstructing ku(w)a for Proto-Japonic. This entry appears to be an error. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig...
Unclear how Proto-Indo-Iranian *pr̥Hwás (“ancient, old”) would be related to Proto-Japonic puru. I note too that this derives from Proto-Indo-European...
connection to Proto-Indo-European is speculative at best. See also notes at Reconstruction_talk:Proto-Japonic/ni#Derivation -- Japonic -te is from -tu...