so I'll open up a section there. I'll list all of "<span class="searchmatch">can</span> <span class="searchmatch">do</span> <span class="searchmatch">without</span>", "<span class="searchmatch">can</span> <span class="searchmatch">do</span> with", "could <span class="searchmatch">do</span> <span class="searchmatch">without</span>", etc, because I assume they're equally idiomatic...
"shall <span class="searchmatch">do</span> <span class="searchmatch">without</span>", "should <span class="searchmatch">do</span> <span class="searchmatch">without</span>", "might <span class="searchmatch">do</span> <span class="searchmatch">without</span>" and "may <span class="searchmatch">do</span> <span class="searchmatch">without</span>". Mglovesfun (talk) 17:08, 26 November 2013 (UTC) "I could/<span class="searchmatch">can</span> <span class="searchmatch">do</span> <span class="searchmatch">without</span> remarks...
page from the talk pages of could <span class="searchmatch">do</span> with, <span class="searchmatch">can</span> <span class="searchmatch">do</span> with, <span class="searchmatch">can</span> <span class="searchmatch">do</span> <span class="searchmatch">without</span>, could have done with, and could have done <span class="searchmatch">without</span>. — Beobach 18:41, 29 December 2010...
manage <span class="searchmatch">without</span>. --Backinstadiums (talk) 17:23, 5 September 2021 (UTC) WIHOUT (Adv) 2. With something absent or lacking: will have to <span class="searchmatch">do</span> <span class="searchmatch">without</span>. https://ahdictionary...
documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence. <span class="searchmatch">Do</span> not re-add this information to the article <span class="searchmatch">without</span> also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's...
Wiktionary's verification process. Please <span class="searchmatch">do</span> not re-nominate for verification <span class="searchmatch">without</span> comprehensive reasons for <span class="searchmatch">doing</span> so. 3 rfv-senses tagged since July 2007...
The correct meaning is "unnecessary", something you <span class="searchmatch">can</span> <span class="searchmatch">do</span> <span class="searchmatch">without</span>, from "prescindir" = to <span class="searchmatch">do</span> <span class="searchmatch">without</span>. It could also mean "dispensable", "expendable" or...
(UTC) Note the RFC discussion at Talk:could <span class="searchmatch">do</span> <span class="searchmatch">without</span>. — Beobach 18:41, 29 December 2010 (UTC) See Talk:<span class="searchmatch">can</span> <span class="searchmatch">do</span> with#Deletion debate. bd2412 T 12:49, 14...
Note the RFC discussion at Talk:could <span class="searchmatch">do</span> <span class="searchmatch">without</span>. — Beobach 18:42, 29 December 2010 (UTC) See Talk:<span class="searchmatch">can</span> <span class="searchmatch">do</span> with#Deletion debate. bd2412 T 12:49, 14 March...
just people commenting how "<span class="searchmatch">can</span> be able to <span class="searchmatch">do</span> sth." is grammatically correct but obviously redundant semantically. <span class="searchmatch">Without</span> a proper source I don't think...