Note the RFC discussion at Talk:<span class="searchmatch">could</span> do without. — Beobach 18:42, 29 December 2010 (UTC) See Talk:can do <span class="searchmatch">with</span>#Deletion debate. bd2412 T 12:49, 14 March...
<span class="searchmatch">have</span> archived the discussions here, and linked to this page from the talk pages of <span class="searchmatch">could</span> do <span class="searchmatch">with</span>, can do <span class="searchmatch">with</span>, can do without, <span class="searchmatch">could</span> <span class="searchmatch">have</span> <span class="searchmatch">done</span> <span class="searchmatch">with</span>,...
Note the RFC discussion at Talk:<span class="searchmatch">could</span> do without. — Beobach 18:42, 29 December 2010 (UTC) See Talk:can do <span class="searchmatch">with</span>#Deletion debate. bd2412 T 12:49, 14 March...
About <span class="searchmatch">could</span> <span class="searchmatch">have</span> <span class="searchmatch">done</span> <span class="searchmatch">with</span> and <span class="searchmatch">could</span> <span class="searchmatch">have</span> <span class="searchmatch">done</span> without, these seem to be transparent tenses that we do not need, since we <span class="searchmatch">have</span> understood but not <span class="searchmatch">have</span> understood...
the definition. --Backinstadiums (talk) 10:57, 22 June 2021 (UTC) <span class="searchmatch">Done</span>. You <span class="searchmatch">could</span> <span class="searchmatch">have</span> <span class="searchmatch">done</span> it yourself. SemperBlotto (talk) 11:10, 22 June 2021 (UTC)...
224.155 (talk). Thanks for spotting that - I <span class="searchmatch">have</span> tried to improve the definition (you <span class="searchmatch">could</span> <span class="searchmatch">have</span> <span class="searchmatch">done</span> that yourself). SemperBlotto 13:08, 22 May 2006...
Chinese translation? It's now from "<span class="searchmatch">have</span> a word <span class="searchmatch">with</span> someone". --Hekaheka 13:39, 4 June 2010 (UTC) No worries. <span class="searchmatch">Done</span>. ---> Tooironic 14:53, 4 June 2010...
Agreed. Keep. --Daniel. 01:15, 14 April 2010 (UTC) Synonym <span class="searchmatch">could</span> be what <span class="searchmatch">have</span> you <span class="searchmatch">done</span> <span class="searchmatch">with</span> the real someone --Rising Sun talk? contributions 21:24, 14...
suppose you can put it down to gross stupidity." Ingrid Seward, editor of Majesty magazine, when asked how Harry <span class="searchmatch">could</span> <span class="searchmatch">have</span> <span class="searchmatch">done</span> something like this [1]...
Chinese translation? It's now from "<span class="searchmatch">have</span> a word <span class="searchmatch">with</span> someone". --Hekaheka 13:39, 4 June 2010 (UTC) No worries. <span class="searchmatch">Done</span>. ---> Tooironic 14:53, 4 June 2010...