difference between what we call <span class="searchmatch">idiomatic</span> in terms of WT:CFI and '<span class="searchmatch">idiomatic</span>' in the lexical sense. We use a special sense of <span class="searchmatch">idiomatic</span> in WT:CFI that's Wiktionary-only...
should not be re-entered without careful consideration. Template:es-note-<span class="searchmatch">idiomatic</span>-uses-of-tener A poorly formatted usage note that just belongs in one entry...
using {{&lit}} is something like "Used compositionally" or "Used non-<span class="searchmatch">idiomatically</span>". The first is not suitable for normal users and the second is somewhat...
creates "inflection" for possessives, whether such forms make sense (are <span class="searchmatch">idiomatic</span>) or not. These forms are neither seful nor are they in any ind irregular...
just my opinion, but {{rfd-sense}} only works for senses that are not <span class="searchmatch">idiomatic</span> or dictionary material. If it's a question of whether it exists, there's...
day", not just "one day". This is a combination of two words that has an <span class="searchmatch">idiomatic</span> meaning, but you've omitted part of that meaning. I would simply put this...
unlinking to migrate to Module:labels/data, also I tried using {{context|<span class="searchmatch">idiomatic</span>|metaphor|lang=en}} at other fish in the sea and neither the category Category:English...
MacKenzie 15:20, 23 October 2007 (UTC) We do redirect some variants of <span class="searchmatch">idiomatic</span> phrases, and between titles with digraphs and those with separate unicode...
it's for. While {{a|<span class="searchmatch">idiomatic</span>}} may not be an obvious error {{accent|<span class="searchmatch">idiomatic</span>}} is, because nobody would think that '<span class="searchmatch">idiomatic</span>' is an accent. By the...
9 June 2012 (UTC) "Niech sczeznę", "niech zginę" etc. are certainly <span class="searchmatch">idiomatic</span> Polish. If the tables cover many potential forms, e.g. stylistically improbable...