See Template talk:<span class="searchmatch">archive</span> box#RFDO discussion: August–December 2014....
transcluded in a number of pages. So I've redirected it to template:<span class="searchmatch">rfv</span>-<span class="searchmatch">archived</span> (with which it shares the parameter name).—msh210℠ (talk) 19:08, 2 November...
lossless. The problem with {{<span class="searchmatch">archived</span> from tea room}} is with finding where the <span class="searchmatch">archived</span> discussion ends (i.e. where to put {{<span class="searchmatch">archive</span>-bottom}}). It would be...
The only thing we <span class="searchmatch">archive</span> is the <span class="searchmatch">RFV</span> discussion; the disputed information, and any documentation gathered so far, will only be <span class="searchmatch">archived</span> if they're included...
template very nicely included the actual discussion (cut-n-pasted) from <span class="searchmatch">RFV</span>. That method might be better, after all. --Connel MacKenzie T C 18:17, 16...
I think this one's a little confusing. It looks more like an rfd than an <span class="searchmatch">rfv</span>. Millie 00:28, 8 February 2006 (UTC) Heh, I dunno. I thought it captured...
Durably <span class="searchmatch">archived</span> citations are required to meet the criteria for inclusion, but a durably <span class="searchmatch">archived</span> quotation might not be the best example of use. Why...
See Template talk:<span class="searchmatch">archive</span> box#RFDO discussion: August–December 2014....
Kept. See <span class="searchmatch">archived</span> discussion. 08:53, 19 January 2008 (UTC) Not as a criticism of anyone, just my opinion, but {{rfd-sense}} only works for senses that...
verification. This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an <span class="searchmatch">archive</span>. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions...