User:KYPark/sugar cane

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word User:KYPark/sugar cane. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word User:KYPark/sugar cane, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say User:KYPark/sugar cane in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word User:KYPark/sugar cane you have here. The definition of the word User:KYPark/sugar cane will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofUser:KYPark/sugar cane, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
eng: sugar cane
fre: canne à sucre (fr) f
ita: canna da zucchero f
por: cana-de-açúcar (pt) f
spa: caña de azúcar f

dut: suikerriet (nl) n

dan: sukkerrør n
deu: Zuckerrohr (de) n
ice: sykurreyr m
swe: sockerrör n

cze: cukrová třtina f
mac: шеќерна трска f (šéḱerna t'rska)
pol: trzcina cukrowa f
rus: сахарный тростник (ru) m (sáxarnyj trostník)
ukr: цукрова тростина f (cukróva trostýna)

Ara: قصب السكر m (qáṣab al-súkkar)
per: نیشکر (neyڑakar)
chi: 甘蔗 (gānzhe)
jpn: 砂糖黍 (さとうきび, satōkibi)
kor: 사탕수수 (satang-susu)

It may be best guessed from the above translations that all of these are a calque of the unknown origin or etymon beyond Proto-Indo-European. See also Wiktionary:Etymology scriptorium/cane. --KYPark (talk) 03:00, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Not quite. The Persian and everything above it in your table got the "sugar" part of it by borrowing, ultimately from India, where in Sanskrit शर्करा (śárkarā) is attested as meaning both gravel and sugar. The ś corresponds to a k sound in the Indo-European centum branches, as shown by related words such as calculus and calcium, and the current consensus seems to be that the k is the original sound and the ś is a more recent innovation in part of the Indo-European dialect continuum. Simply put, It can't be pre-Indoeuropean because it can be traced back to a form incompatible with your guess at the Indo-European stage. You would have to explain why it changed from an sh form to a k form, and then back. You would also have to explain why we should ignore other pronunciations such as tang for the same characters in the same languages. Chuck Entz (talk) 05:23, 25 August 2012 (UTC)