Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word User:Surjection/Finnic tree. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word User:Surjection/Finnic tree, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say User:Surjection/Finnic tree in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word User:Surjection/Finnic tree you have here. The definition of the word User:Surjection/Finnic tree will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofUser:Surjection/Finnic tree, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Finnic
All nodes with children are groupings of lects. Groupings which are widely accepted as "languages" are bolded. Extinct lects or languages are marked with a cross (†). Only leaf nodes represent lects.
Estonian: Standard Estonian is primarily based on Central Estonian varieties.
Finnish: Standard Finnish is a compromise between its dialects, constructed out of a Western Finnish base with considerable Eastern Finnish influence and a tendency towards preferring archaisms. Old Literary Finnish was largely based on Southwestern Finnish dialects, but this influence was levelled as a result of intentional developments in the 1800s. The exact proportions of each dialect group and their representation in the standard language is a matter of some debate.
Ingrian: Developed by V. I. Junus in 1936, except that the orthography used on Wiktionary is per Chernyavskij and Konkova. The literary language was suppressed and abandoned not long after, but its use has been somewhat revived starting from the 1990s. It is based on both the Soikkola and Lower Luga dialects, with some bias towards the former.
Karelian: Currently treated as one language on Wiktionary, even though there are separate literary languages for North Karelian and Tver Karelian, the former was developed starting from the 1990s (but has gone through major changes since then as well) and the latter first developed in the 1930s. A South Karelian literary language is also under development. No unifying literary standard exists, and Wiktionary currently accepts all three standards as equal but as subvarieties of the same language.
Livonian: The revival efforts are based on the only (recently) surviving dialect, the Western Curonian dialect. Historical texts were mostly based on Curonian dialects as well. While most Wiktionary entries use these forms, Salaca forms are also seen and are not currently classified as alternative forms.
Livvi: A written language developed in the early 2000s. Not based on any single dialect, but as a compromise.
Ludian: A written language developed in the early 2010s. Not based on any single dialect, but as a compromise.
Veps: A written language designed as a compromise between its dialects and to emphasize features specific to Veps as well as archaisms. It is however not accepted by all speakers, some of whom consider it to be too biased towards Northern Veps. A Veps literary language (based on Central Veps) was first developed in the late 1930s, but soon suppressed and abandoned.
Võro: Taken as a representative of all of South Estonian. However, the other varieties tend to have some kind of literary forms as well (although they are not as established), and it was the Tartu variety that had prestige historically in what is termed Old Literary South Estonian.
Votic: No standard exists. Only one dialect survives, however. Votic entries on Wiktionary are currently lemmatized under an orthography used by some recent works (see WT:AVOT).
Notes
The Finnic family tree has been warped in structure by copious areal influence, notable examples of which include:
Latvian influence on Livonian, causing it to diverge significantly
North Estonian influence on South Estonian, resulting in convergence
northern dialects in Finland, which are mixtures of Western and Eastern Finnish dialects
↑ 2.02.12.22.3Kallio, Petri. Vanhan kirjaeteläviron äännehistoriaa. (2018)
↑ 3.03.13.23.33.43.5Pajusalu, Karl; Hennoste, Tiit; Niit, Ellen; Päll, Peeter; Viikberg; Jüri. Eesti murded ja kohanimed. 3. edition (2018)
↑ 4.04.14.24.3Kuznetsova, Natalia; Markus, Elena; Muslimov, Mehmet. Finnic Minorities in Ingria: The Current Sociolinguistic Situation and Its Background. in Marten, Heiko. F.; Rießler, Michael; Saarikivi, Janne; Toivanen, Reetta (editors). Cultural and Linguistic Minorities in the Russian Federation and the European Union. Comparative Studies on Equality and Diversity (2015)
↑ 5.05.1Viitso, Tiit-Rein. Fennic, in Abondolo, Daniel (editor). The Uralic Languages (1998)
↑ 6.06.16.26.3Karjalan kielen murteet. Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskuksen julkaisuja 129. Kotimaisten kielten keskus .
↑ 7.07.17.27.37.4Kujärven Obraman Fed’uun Miikul (Miikul Pahomov). Lyydien alkuperä, at the Itämerensuomen koti conference (20.10.2006).