The templates add categories and ensure consistent formatting. If you don't know the right templates for a language, at least use {{head}}. Also, I may be wrong about whether this applies to you (a babel-box would help), but: be careful about editing in languages you don't know well. It's very easy to run afoul of unexpected peculiarities of specific languages. For instance, Welsh has not only singular and plural, but also singulative and collective. Thanks! Chuck Entz (talk) 22:53, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
When you add interwikis such as ], please don't put a space in there, as in ]. While it does work fine that way, it gets tagged as an error by an abuse filter, which clutters up the abuse logs. Thanks! Chuck Entz (talk) 16:06, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Austrian translations would be listed under German, we have no separate language code for Austrian; furthermore, "ast" is the code for Asturian. "Northern Fisian" should be "North Frisian". DTLHS (talk) 17:48, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Please be more careful. Look at the Chechen translation in this diff, the Abkhaz translation in this diff. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 16:48, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
It's "Ukrainian", not "Ukranian". DTLHS (talk) 03:47, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, could you add Persian transliterations whilst you are adding tranlsations into Persian, please? Kaixinguo~enwiktionary (talk) 09:47, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
Hey! You kind of messed up the Romanian translation (a couple of times actually). Don't know if it was intentional, but I fixed it for you. Just please try to be more careful. --Robbie SWE (talk) 12:39, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Hey. We have a bot that periodically makes French conjugated entries, so there's no real need to add all of them yourself. --New WT User Girl (talk) 21:35, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Please don't forget that we use straight apostrophes here, not curly ones. Per utramque cavernam 15:41, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Since you are bold enough to list your various IP addresses, any chance we can get you on User:PseudoSkull/Etymologies_of_usernames? (Or is it "doesn't publicise user history"?) Cheers, Equinox ◑ 03:17, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
The entry looked good, but the usual practice is to turn the least common variant (in durable sources) into an alternative form using a form-of template. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 08:37, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
They are looking good, but the phonemic transcription of the long e used here is /eː/, with being the phonetic transcription. Also we transcribe /oː/ instead of /o/, and this long o can be realised as or . ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 11:38, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
In diff, you entered Czech "sériová vražda" as a translation, which is wrong. This was a edit adding a large number of languages that you probably do not know. When working on languages you do not know, you have to be very careful. --Dan Polansky (talk) 15:19, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
{{etyl}}Please don't use this template anymore. It's deprecated and we're working to get rid of it. Instead, use the more specific templates {{inh}}, {{bor}} or {{der}}. —Rua (mew) 10:46, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
In diff, you entered many translations in different languages at once. Can you please clarify how you verified the translations to be correct? --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:16, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Czech:
Dutch:
German:
French:
Polish:
Slovak:
Swedish:
I hope that answers your question DPUH (talk) 12:11, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
May I ask for a source for Slovene enorog meaning narwhal? My sources do not give this meaning. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:49, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
May I ask where I can verify Tamil சப்தசோதனைக்குழல், entered to mean stethoscope? --Dan Polansky (talk) 13:11, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
оруэллизм looks like it is a noun meaning Orwellianism, doesn't it? (diff). --Dan Polansky (talk) 05:28, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
I would create оруэллизм to mean Orwellianism, but I am not sure it is attested (WT:ATTEST); it has some hits in google books:"оруэллизм", but these could be mentions and we need uses. --Dan Polansky (talk) 06:17, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Share your experience in this survey
Hi DPUH,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wiktionary and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 14:34, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Share your experience in this survey
Hi DPUH,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 19:14, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Share your experience in this survey
Hi DPUH,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 17:04, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Please don't just mass important translations by looking at Wikipedia article equivalents in other language Wikipedias. E.g. the Gothic word you added here and here are (obviously, in the former case) not attested (see WT:ATTEST) and shouldn't have been added. Be careful when dealing with material from languages you don't know! — Mnemosientje (t · c) 16:08, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
I saw your entry of Dutch cyanose, and while most of it was good, I noticed that the date 1913 corresponded to the oldest cite in the Woordenboek der Nederlandsche Taal. There are two problems with this, first of all it directly copies their work and might be a copyvio, secondly the WNT often makes no serious attempt to retrieve the oldest possible attestation so these dates will often be wrong. In this case the word appears in newspapers beginning in the 1830s. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 08:04, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
<insert standard scold about editing with reasonable-certainty here> — Zack. —
Hi DPUH, you created the lemma Ɂi¹nda³ back in 2019. While the spelling suggests IPA, the digits in the lemma are unclear. They are probably tones or pitch accents, and ¹, ³ might suggest low and mid tone, respectively. However, this is far from sure, since digits are also used in transcriptions of Norwegian, Swedish or Limburgish to distinguish pitch accent or contour tones. Since the Ixcatec language article on Wikipedia gives scant information, the nature of Ixcatec prosody remains unclear. Could you clarify what exactly is meant by these numbers? Steinbach (talk) 17:25, 25 October 2021 (UTC)