From Chambers 2005: "digg'er n a person or animal that digs; a miner, esp a gold-miner; an Australian or New Zealand soldier; an informal Australian term of address; a machine for digging." This suggests that the stuff you removed was correct. Equinox ◑ 00:40, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Dmol. I certainly didn't label this as Canadian only. I marked it British, Canadian, much as my CanOD does (“Brit. & Cdn.”).
“Commonwealth English” is a useless label – there is no such variety of the language, and the term is absent from linguistics and from all dictionaries. Canada is in the Commonwealth, but its speech and writing are not based on British English. —Michael Z. 2009-04-01 03:26 z
This is supposedly how Irish Travellers refer to themselves. Jews call themselves "Jews". Is "Jew" pejorative/derogatory? The fact that someone might use "Jew" with derogatory intent does not make it derogatory. "Pavee" seems the same. DCDuring TALK 00:51, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Okay to move this to (deprecated template usage) banker's lamp? Equinox ◑ 11:50, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Reminds me of a sign I saw at burger king. "WE NOW ACCEPT YOUR SNAP CARDS'"Gtroy 23:00, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Dmol (uncountable)
Hi Dmol,
Were you still planning to follow up on this, or should I go ahead and fail both senses?
Thanks in advance,
—RuakhTALK 20:24, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Just letting you know of this surprisingly contentious vote. Input from more Wiktionarians such as yourself would be much appreciated. Thanks. – Krun 09:30, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
Er - that's not actually separate from the sense already there, ie this word is now spelled mark. It's exactly the same word as we used for the currency of Germany. Ƿidsiþ 10:51, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello, any chance you add a {{Babel}} box to your user page? I'd appreciate it. --Dan Polansky 06:33, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi. The RfV discussion for Kosovo you keep referring to did not accept anything. You brought it to RfV because anons were changing it, then some people expressed some thoughts, then anon activity ceased and someone struck the discussion. If you feel that the current definition is POV, please bring Kosovo to RfV so that we can come to a real consensus. --Vahag 15:28, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
There is no data of the name Monica before St. Augustine's Confessions. The mention of the saint is quite essential to the etymology. Ideally all etymologies should say when the name was first assessed- compare Per. That's why saints are put into etymologies. Do you have written proof that the name Ciarán existed before St. Ciarán of Saigir? I will put back that saint too unless you provide evidence. I've the impression that you edit on basis of your personal experience - and that's quite valuable in discussion rooms about English usage - but questions of etymology and frequency must be based on dictionaries and statistics. --Makaokalani 09:09, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
FYI, you recently took part in an RFD on Britain and Ireland. I've opened a thread on the term in the tea room. Essentially, I am providing citations to support its inclusion (both ones that define the term as a synonym to British Isles and that demonstrate its use beyond a sum of parts of Britain and Ireland).
Regards, --Rannpháirtí anaithnid 21:47, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
so if it is not limited to that category, what if it is definitely relevant to that area. I have a goal off adding emergency medicine terminology here. Would it be best if I just create an appendix or gallery of all the relevant terms in one place then?Gtroy 22:16, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Well that is what I initially wanted to do but SemperBlotto told me he created a template instead and that it was a category too and to use that and since he is quick to block for almost any reason I am not keen on disregarding what he told me to do. As for 1-2-can-do I know for sure you can find it in the guidebook for San Francisco's NERTS program.Gtroy 22:31, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
I need help with SAMPLE should I try to figure out how to create a new article in all caps which I currently cannot do if not is there a better way of formatting my entry at sample ?Gtroy 23:24, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
I'v had another go at fixing the UK usage note - please see the talk page. Also, I would hope the fact that I'm editing anonymously is irrelevant. 109.155.172.74 21:24, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Hey, it's a word, you know :) Equinox ◑ 13:10, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi. You might like to comment on what I've written at Talk:tilly. Cheers, Bjenks (talk) 06:13, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Calling Sami "nomadic" is a grave simplification. Please read Sami, which defines the Sami livelihood as: "Traditionally, the Sami have pursued a variety of livelihoods, including coastal fishing, fur trapping, and sheep herding. Their best-known means of livelihood is semi-nomadic reindeer herding.". I admit that my wording wasn't the best possible either. I'll substitute "indigenous" for "nomadic". That, at least, is an undisputed attribute. --Hekaheka (talk) 16:05, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Dmol. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Dmol~enwiktionary that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
23:43, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
It looks like we're in an edit war. I suggest that we resolve this here. For your reference, here is a good explanation of the grammatical issue that I described in my edit summary. WikiWinters ☯ 韦安智 21:40, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Naturism and Naturalism are two very different words with very distinct definitions. No "request for verification" is needed; just check any dictionary and you will see this is the case. Eg: http://www.wikidiff.com/naturalist/naturist
Xanderox (talk) 20:01, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Also, this should further clear up the fact that the "mix up" is not common: https://sites.google.com/site/emilyrussavage/prescriptivism
Assault rifles have to be select fire. I think you are confusing the term assault weapon and assault rifle. Afootpluto (talk) 13:23, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
It's not a commentary, it's just facts. It's not another definition, it's the same definition, only complete. Even Oxford Dictionary's definition is written similarly. 151.68.168.216 21:21, 21 July 2022 (UTC)