Could you please add "{{infl|it|verb form}}" instead of the word when batch loading articles from file as in f.e. accasciandovi, accasciandoti,accasciandomi, accasciandoci, abbuffandovi, etc. Otherwise the pages fill up Special:UncategorizedPages again while i am trying to get that endless list smaller. Thanks Mutante 22:48, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Not every italian participle has a female or plural form. Participles of verbs which are to conjugate with "avere" altough they are intransitive, cannot exist. Exemples: abbaiati, pranzati.... Sorry, it's simply ridiculous --85.1.137.47 14:11, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Does the bot follow the recent changes, or just your most recent edits? I occasionally find Italian words that have red linked plural, I'm assuming these are older entries, right? Mglovesfun (talk) 14:17, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Just a heads-up: we might change the appearance of non-gloss definitions (see here) and as your Italian adjective forms don't use a template, they would become inconsistent. —Internoob (Disc•Cont) 01:43, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
{{form of|...|lang=it}}
(not lang=Italian, which might be phased out eventually). Mglovesfun (talk) 17:53, 16 September 2010 (UTC)Latin has no common gender; only masculine, feminine, and neuter. The "common gender" in linguistics is not the same as "common to all genders". --EncycloPetey 08:53, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Also, the inflection line was missing a standard macron in the ending. This may be a problem on previously generated pages. --EncycloPetey 09:12, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Please conjugate préconiser
Template:mf is deprecated and has been deleted. Please use {{m|f}}
instead.Matthias Buchmeier 16:10, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
Hey, SB, do you think you could have a look at ], please? I have no idea whether it's up your alley or not, but if not then I have no idea whose it would be up.—msh210℠ (talk) 06:12, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
diff, not sure why, not too many entries affected right now, just 9 including that one. --Mglovesfun (talk) 15:42, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi, there's some weird pronunciation going on over here. Is possibly my fault --Rockpilot 21:13, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
minauder can be added to the FeedMe page. Thanks --Simplus2 12:00, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
It seems that there's a missing macron here; it says dēsertorum, but should be dēsertōrum, at least according to the inflection table at desertus. Could this be a systematic problem? – Krun 01:59, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Can you update the bot syntax to do this? Reasons are two fold. lang=French produces {{French/script}}
(doesn't exist) and French has two plural past participles, masculine and feminine. Mglovesfun (talk) 13:21, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Category:it verb forms. Maro (talk) 19:46, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. there was a mistake with transpercer - see . Perhaps a bug in the code. --Coippf (talk) 12:19, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
I don't know if there is only one verb with that bug but I found one. Forms of imprimo, for example impresserat, link to the verb imprĭmo instead of imprimo. Another: imprĭmis also links to imprimo but No pages link to imprĭmis. Maro 22:18, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
It looks like the bot ended up not adding inflections of the Latin discus to disco and disce. Would this have happened for all cases where a page already existed for an inflected form, or just if a page already existed and already had a Latin section? Emufarmers (talk) 06:57, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Please see http://en.wiktionary.orghttps://dictious.com/en/Special:WhatLinksHere/pourfondre . You mistook pourfondre for pourfendre. Regards --Maria.Sion (talk) 11:24, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Bot added a French entry, I removed it and went to modify radical only to find it already said 'radicaux' not 'radicals'. What happened? Mglovesfun (talk) 22:32, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Take a look here. --WikiTiki89 11:12, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Also you entered a dash as the plural form of Humus. PierreAbbat (talk) 03:50, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
You should fix your definitions of all French participles: the definition does not mean anything, it should be singular feminine past participle of envoûter (not envoûté). Lmaltier (talk) 05:33, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Your bot is still adding raw links to entries, like affûtiaux, even though that has been deprecated for a long time. I am working on cleaning up such usage right now (see Category:Entries using form-of templates with a raw link), so could you fix your bot so that it doesn't do that anymore? Thank you. —CodeCat 16:58, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
Why add {{rfc-auto}} on entries like ? Thanks by advance for your answer, Automatik (talk) 01:09, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
I noticed your bot added a space after the word it links to. This is causing problems because the template thinks that the parameter is not a valid page name, so it omits the link. There are others in Category:Entries using form-of templates with a raw link/conjugation of. —CodeCat 15:25, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
In this series of edits , it looks as though the Norwegian change is correct, but the Latin changes are not. --EncycloPetey (talk) 01:26, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
{{form of|Imperative|vise|lang=nb}}
. —CodeCat 01:30, 24 May 2013 (UTC)Hey, Jeff.
Do you think you could have your bot add lang=fr
to {{homophones}}
when it creates French forms. This will (as the template is currently configured) do nothing except that it will change the links to section-sepcific links (so pastiches rather than pastiches).
Thanks.—msh210℠ (talk) 18:22, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
This edit correctly found a problem, but it mangled the fix. — Carolina wren discussió 01:35, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Your bot did something wrong here: diff. It now shows "a fucking of"... —CodeCat 13:33, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Your bot created some entries for Portuguese verb forms, but it seems to have neglected to provide several required parameters, so those pages are showing script errors instead. See prevedes for example. —CodeCat 11:43, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Latin declension tables no longer need separate parameters for the macrons. So these have been removed. I didn't realise your bot used these templates, but I just noticed it now so I'm letting you know. The verb tables still work the old way, but they will probably be changed as well at some point. If I am the one that does it, I hope I remember then to notify you. Could you place notices on the documentation pages, like you did with the Italian templates? —CodeCat 16:38, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
{{plural of}}
doesn't categorise anymore (see WT:NFE), and I noticed your bot hasn't been updated yet, so now it's creating orphaned entries. I've fixed the ones you created, but I'm letting you know in case you need to update your script. —CodeCat 20:02, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
{{plural of}}
. I'm guessing you copied it from some existing entries, but it was never meant to be a permanent thing. I only used the parameter to keep track of things, and now I'm removing it from the entries again. Could you change that in your bot? —CodeCat 19:35, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Dear SemperBlottoBot,
I created a category for you to work on if you want to. An admin has deleted it, but it's still usable.
--Kc kennylau (talk) 06:50, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
I'm planning to do some cleanup work on the template, which will mean shuffling parameters around a bit. Could you hold off making any bot creations for this template until it's finished? —CodeCat 01:58, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
2=
replace pl=
, because that parameter is underused, and 3=
and othergender=
will become m=
and f=
, so that 3=
can replace pl2=
. It mainly brings the template in line with other similar templates like {{ca-noun}}
and {{en-noun}}
, which already work this way. —CodeCat 02:24, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
I don't know if your bot still uses these, but in case it does, it needs to be changed because these have been deprecated and will be orphaned and deleted soon. You can use the g=
parameter on {{head}}
instead, if needed. —CodeCat 21:50, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
I'm working on Module:la-verb, which could replace the templates we have now. Could you hold off from creating new entries from these templates for the moment? —CodeCat 02:16, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi SBB. Please see these corrections I've made. For {{la-decl-1st-Greek-Ma|num=sg}}
, the quantities of the final -ā̆ of the ablative and vocative forms are different, and grammatical number should not be listed in the form-of definitions of pluralia and singularia tantum; also, your bot should be able to distinguish between common and proper nouns (proper nouns have their own form-of headword template, viz. {{la-proper noun-form}}
). Just flagging this up FYI. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 19:34, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Your bot's still making mistakes with forms of Latin proper nouns; see the entries it's created recently for the forms of Geraestus. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 14:07, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
{{m}}
, et al. are deprecatedYou should use |g=
in headwords instead. Keφr 10:33, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Your bot has been generating a few entries which call {{head}}
with g=mf
, which triggers errors. "mf" is not a valid gender code in Module:gender and number, it's only supported by some templates as a specific exception. For {{head}}
you need to use g=m|g2=f
. —CodeCat 16:32, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
An edit by this bot removed the plural from "notte", changing it from "notti" to the base form. I have undone this edit. I think this might be an error with the bot. Velociraptor888 (talk) 19:29, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
{{it-noun}}
. It had been changed to provide the wrong plural. Fixed. SemperBlotto (talk) 08:19, 26 May 2014 (UTC)Special:whatlinkshere/disciformus is nonempty even though ] has never been created AFAICT.—msh210℠ (talk) 06:47, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Please do not create disconvenior for disconvenio. --kc_kennylau (talk) 06:45, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Hey. If you get some time, why not auto-generate thousands of Spanish verb forms? --Type56op9 (talk) 15:36, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
An old error, but an odd one. Checking the latest database dump for other instances of ], Wiktionary:Todo/bad links.) - -sche (discuss) 04:15, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi SBB. To let you know, your bot has made the mistake to put masculine gender on some feminine past participles, for example here. I'm sure there's hundreds of other like that. Is there a quick fix? --Type56op9 (talk) 12:42, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
This template was recently merged into Template:inflection of. I noticed your bot is generating entries with the old template still, could you update it? —CodeCat 21:56, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Note that I had to fix trimée, trimées, trimés : https://en.wiktionary.orghttps://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=trim%C3%A9s&diff=32235599&oldid=27458207 But only for this verb. Are there many such cases to be fixed? Is you bot now OK? Lmaltier (talk) 19:28, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Your bot is creating module errors on French past participle forms. For example at arrhés,
===Verb=== {{head|fr}} {{m|p}} # {{masculine plural past participle of|arrher|lang=fr}}
should be
===Participle=== {{head|fr|past participle form|g=m-p}} # {{masculine plural past participle of|arrher|lang=fr}}
Thanks! —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 10:26, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
One of us hit 4 million. --Type56op9 (talk) 10:00, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Your bot has made a few mistakes in entries it generated recently:
{{f}}
which was deleted over a year ago.{{head}}
. I've fixed these with a bot for the most part.—CodeCat 17:48, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Can you slow him down? --kc_kennylau (talk) 08:13, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
@SemperBlotto, please delete this pile of crap that your automaton created. --Romanophile ♞ (contributions) 16:00, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
In this edit diff your bot added a French section when there was already an existing French section. DTLHS (talk) 13:55, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
I've copied Template:de-noun's pluralization functionality over to this template and updated the documentation. This has not changed how any of the existing named or positional parameters work, it merely adds an unnamed positional parameter 3 and two named parameters pl2 and pl3, which function the same way they do on Template:de-noun. - -sche (discuss) 05:17, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
See Cat:E. Chuck Entz (talk) 02:32, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
I added a |num=
parameter to Module:la-adj to make it easier to create inflection tables for singularia and pluralia tanta and to make it more consistent with other Latin templates (such as {{la-decl-1st}}
) for which you can do the same thing. I've removed all |type=pl
parameters from existing entries and replaced them with |num=pl
. Edit the bot accordingly. Esszet (talk) 13:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
I noticed that while Portuguese verbs have been fixed to follow the 1990 Orthographic Convention, the third person plural subjunctive form of dar still has the old spelling dêem; it should be "deem" without the circumflex. The individual pages for those two spellings may also need updating. S. Neuman (talk) 19:57, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi @SemperBlotto. When your bot creates non-lemma entries from transclusions of {{la-decl-3rd-comp}}
, could you use {{la-comp-form}}
to generate the headword lines, rather than {{la-adj-form}}
, please? — I.S.M.E.T.A. 12:27, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi SB(B). I've made some changes:
{{la-decl-1&2}}
, the old |type=greek
is now |type=greekA
. |type=greekA
displays as in adespotos.|type=greekE
has been added to {{la-decl-1&2}}
. |type=greekE
displays as in rhētoricōteros.{{la-adecl-2nd}}
. In that declension, the feminine forms are isomorphic with the masculine forms; in non-lemma entries, the masc./fem. forms will need duplicated sense lines, as in the case of non-lemma forms of adjectives declined per {{la-decl-3rd-2E}}
.
|type=greek
, displays as in chrȳsocarpos.I hope that's all clear. Ping me for further explanation if not. Thanks. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 14:03, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Please see the documentation for the new format. --kc_kennylau (talk) 14:36, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Adding an -n to dative plurals in German is not always correct. I found a few examples where your bot did this, for example Rektan. --Bruno413 (talk) 15:59, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi! There are a bunch of module errors (Cat:E) for some edits adding entries for Portuguese verb forms. This relates to the list of conjugations in Module:pt-verb-form-of. Not sure how to fix this, though I added a more informative error message. — Eru·tuon 02:37, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, a bunch of missing parameters in entries for verb forms of spaurarsi. — Eru·tuon 19:34, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
I therefore marked the word as junk. Christa Bella (talk) 19:17, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
I think that the current text on the page is alright. 2001:14BB:42:940F:8D54:328C:59DF:9418 08:52, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
You auto-generated entries for forms of the Latin adjective "citer" on 9 March 2016. Unfortunately, while they all seem to have been generated on the right pages, a number of them managed to misspell the relevant form within the Latin entry itself, omitting the 'r' in the following forms: citrum, citram, citrae, citri, citrorum, citros, citrarum, citris, citras. I have corrected these typos; however, I am concerned, since the entries were auto-generated, that a similar problem may have arisen in the auto-generation of forms of other similar Latin adjectives (or nouns) ending in -er, so I wanted to bring it to your attention. LacrimosaDiesIlla (talk) 17:01, 29 January 2018 (UTC)