Wiktionary:Vandalism in progress
Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Vandalism in progress. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Vandalism in progress, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Vandalism in progress in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Vandalism in progress you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Vandalism in progress will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Vandalism in progress, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
This page is intended to get administrator attention quickly for dealing with issues related to vandalism such as blocking, page-protection, revision deletion, etc. Note: The requested admin actions must be clear-cut and uncontroversial. Thank you for helping us keep an organized Wiktionary!
List new alerts at the top of the list in the following manner for reporting vandals:
* {{vandal|username or IP (without User: prefix)}} Brief reason, if unobvious ~~~~
For hiding and protection requests, make a link to the diff or the page to be protected.
Denied requests will usually have an explanation added here, and be kept for one to seven days before being removed.
Instructions: Please remove performed requests.
You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
New alerts
- 167.248.152.47 (talk) and 2600:1009:B170:2146:552F:5F58:FA3C:1B0F (talk) -- same person as reported previously —Fish bowl (talk) 04:43, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Looking at diffs, edits like this are not obvious vandalism. Do you have a diff or two that makes it clear that this person needs to be blocked? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:44, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- That one is fine but they also have a number of previous edits that I have reported in the past few days under other addresses. shows that they are not responding to blocks (falsifying simplified forms by """"analogy"""" from 廣→广). —Fish bowl (talk) 04:48, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Special:Contributions/167.248.0.0/16 shows a long history of bad edits dating to September 2023. —Fish bowl (talk) 22:22, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- Bad edits are not the same thing as vandalism. You're not making it easy for anyone else here, which is why posts you've made like this have stood for days with no action. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:58, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- and were dealt with speedily, and "Adding nonsense/gibberish" is a valid block reason. IDK what's your problem man. —Fish bowl (talk) 03:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- My problem? I'm just telling you how you can make your cryptic reports genuinely useful to another person. If you don't want to do that, I can't make you be intelligible. "x is a bad edit" is just not the same thing as vandalism. Do you sincerely not understand that? The diffs you just gave at least attempted to explain why it's vandalism with inserting false information. The report you posted here is just "a similar guy to before" on a page that is edited several hundred times a year. You've done this before as well and just expect everyone else to spontaneously read your mind. Then you get mad at the person who is actually trying to help by teasing out the information you're being occult about? Good luck communicating with someone. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Koavf @Fish bowl is (quite reasonably) expecting the admin dealing to either be familiar with the language in question, or to take their word for it as a longstanding, capable contributor. If you don't feel able to deal with these reports that's fine, but clearly other admins do. Theknightwho (talk) 03:16, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hence I've left up his obscure reports so someone else can bother dealing with them. If you want to, have at it. If he wants to keep on posting "same person as reported previously" or just ignore someone trying to help him make a useful report, then good luck to him and anyone else who wants to spend time decoding and investigating. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Koavf @Fish bowl is (quite reasonably) expecting the admin dealing to either be familiar with the language in question, or to take their word for it as a longstanding, capable contributor. If you don't feel able to deal with these reports that's fine, but clearly other admins do. Theknightwho (talk) 03:16, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Re: this, I think others care, but we're not all competent in CJK languages. I'll leave this here for a bit longer in case any other admins with competency in these languages want to intervene. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- My problem? I'm just telling you how you can make your cryptic reports genuinely useful to another person. If you don't want to do that, I can't make you be intelligible. "x is a bad edit" is just not the same thing as vandalism. Do you sincerely not understand that? The diffs you just gave at least attempted to explain why it's vandalism with inserting false information. The report you posted here is just "a similar guy to before" on a page that is edited several hundred times a year. You've done this before as well and just expect everyone else to spontaneously read your mind. Then you get mad at the person who is actually trying to help by teasing out the information you're being occult about? Good luck communicating with someone. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- and were dealt with speedily, and "Adding nonsense/gibberish" is a valid block reason. IDK what's your problem man. —Fish bowl (talk) 03:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Bad edits are not the same thing as vandalism. You're not making it easy for anyone else here, which is why posts you've made like this have stood for days with no action. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:58, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Looking at diffs, edits like this are not obvious vandalism. Do you have a diff or two that makes it clear that this person needs to be blocked? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:44, 25 June 2024 (UTC)