Se også: Ambassade/Embassy
![]() |
Arkiv |
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 |
@Mewasul: @Teodor605: @Asav: God ettermiddag! Jeg har foreslått emnet Identifikator for en term i Språkrådets termwiki på Wikidata https://www.wikidata.orghttps://dictious.com/no/Wikidata:Property_proposal/The_Language_Council_of_Norway_Term_ID Om det passer ber jeg dere lese forslaget og eventuelt komme med kommentarer og støtte. Mvh --Pmt (diskusjon) 18. jan. 2021 kl. 17:41 (CET)
Jeg skjønner ikke noe av kategoriene etter språk. Når jeg klikker på emner etter språk, og velger no:emner, kan jeg klikke på emner etter språk, deretter no:emner, emner etter språk, så no:emner og sånn kan jeg holde på i det uendelige. (Jeg har åpenbart ikke belegg for den siste påstanden siden det ville være umulig😆). Er det noe jeg har misforstått? Dette ser ut til å være konsekvent i kategoriene jeg har klikket meg inn i. — Mvh. Abuluntu 👨🏼💻💬 24. mai 2021 kl. 15:14 (CEST)
Hei. Jeg har akkurat blitt oppmerksom på at ordbøkenes lisens nylig er endret til en fri lisens som passer for prosjektene. Er det noen botkjørere som kan nyttiggjøre seg av det? — Mvh. Abuluntu 👨🏼💻💬 11. nov. 2021 kl. 09:32 (CET)
Hei, alle sammen! Vil gjerne minne om at 20. mai er fristen for å søke om wikistipend fra Wikimedia Norge. Man kan søke om opptil 8000, og hva man kan søke om penger til er veldig åpent, så lenge det gavner Wikimedia-prosjektene på en eller annen måte. Eksempler på wikistipend som har blitt delt ut tidligere er reisestipend for å delta på Wikimedia-konferanser, reisestipend til å delta på kulturarrangementer eller andre arrangementer for å ta bilder, stipend for å gå til innkjøp av bøker eller annet materiale som kan brukes som kilder til Wikipedia-artikler, eller stipender for å holde arrangementer med wikifokus (men det er selvsagt ikke begrensa til bare disse tingene – fantasien (og utdelingskomiteen) setter grensene). Så løp og søk!
To ganger i året deler vi også ut gratis tilganger til mediearkivet Retriever til de som melder seg på. Vi har seks slike tilganger som kan deles ut, og vi prioriterer selvsagt de som vil bruke en slik tilgang til å berike Wikipedia eller andre Wikimedia-prosjekter, og de som ikke har hatt slik tilgang tidligere stiller først i køen (men det er selvsagt ikke noe i veien for å skrive seg på om man har hatt tilgang tidligere). Hvis du er interessert så skriv deg på lista på Wikipedia:Biblioteket/Lukkede kilder. Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) (diskusjon) 13. mai 2022 kl. 10:12 (CEST)
Verben ta och avta verkar betyda samma sak på norska och svenska, men stämmer det att "ta av" kan betyda öka/lyfta, motsvarande engelska "take off"? (Salget har tatt av.) På svenska är det en synonym till "avta" (minska). Sajten ordbokene.no dokumenterar ta och avta, men inte ta av. -- LA2 (diskusjon) 14. aug. 2022 kl. 20:46 (CEST)
Hei! 20. november skal etter planen tilgangene til Retriever omfordeles. Hvis du er interessert i å få tilgang kan du skrive deg på lista nederst på w:Wikipedia:Biblioteket/Lukkede kilder. Denne kunngjøringa kommer litt seint, men det er ikke noe problem å skrive seg på lista også litt etter 20. november.
20. november er også fristen for å søke om wikistipend fra Wikimedia Norge – vi pleier ikke å få mange søknader, så sjansene er gode til å få et stipend om du har en idé til noe som du trenger litt ekstra penger til å gjennomføre. Det kan stort sett være hva som helst så lenge resultatet gagner Wikimedia-prosjekter på noe vis. Løp og søk! Jon Harald Søby (WMNO) (diskusjon) 17. nov. 2022 kl. 14:13 (CET)
Hei, Jeg ønsker å lage et oppslagsverk for elever på videregående skole i fagretningen brønnteknikk. Jeg ønsker at elevene skal kunne finne fram til disse ordene enkelt uten å bli avledet av andre oppslag. Er det mulig på Wiktionary å lage et oppslagsverk som vises i èn kategori med alle ordene tilgjengelig? For eksempel hvis eleven velger brønnteknikk som kategori, vil de da kunne søke innenfor kategorien etter flere ulike oppslag? Vennlig hilsen Sissel Sissel Paaske (diskusjon) 22. nov. 2024 kl. 10:27 (CET)
Hi. Not a Norwegian speaker, sorry for writing in English. I received some complaints from one of your guys because of a wrong and confusing code handling on es.wikt (Spanish Wiktionary) for Bokmål and Nynorsk. I should take a decision between keeping the languages separated or unifying them on one code. As a Spanish speaker, the arguments I saw on en.wikt for those who opposed to the unification seem senseless for me. For example they argued that there are some "frequent or fundamental words" that are different, and that the inflection of words are different. But that happens in Spanish too. For those who know a little Spanish, where I live (Argentina) aun/aún (even/still, i.e. "fundamental words") became almost obsolete and fully replaced for incluso/todavía. I could give a thousand of examples with differences on vocabulary, even in "fundamental words". There's voseo here, meaning that we use vos instead of tú (you), which also means that the verbs are conjugated different on second person; future tenses are almost no used anymore and the same with composed past tenses. There are some differences in pronoun usage and verb conjugations between the regions. However, I don't think that should be called "Argentinian"; and I don't speak in "Mexican" if I go to Mexico, "Chilean" if I go to Chile nor "Spaniard" if I go to Spain. We all just speak Spanish. Now, after the sermon I gave, I am here to ask for the reasons that drove the community of this site to unify both variants of Norway. Did you have some similar discussions about this in the past? Are they archived somewhere? Where I could find them? And finally, what would be the advantages and disadvantages of unifying? OF course I'm asking for advices to es.wikt. Consider that on L2 language headers we can specify the writing system, if the language has many, and there are tags for dialectal or regional words. Thanks in advance if you read this and answer honestly what is your opinion. Regards. Tmagc (diskusjon) 5. feb. 2025 kl. 23:28 (CET)
Kva er formålet til wiktionary når wikidata ser mye bedre ut å er meir brukervennlig. Det ser også ut som at wikidata er meir populært altså har fleire brukare? OGSÅ finner EG norske ord som er bedre på engelsk wiktionary? Hvorfor? skal eg bruke norsk wiktionary???
Eg tenkjer at wiktionary bør nedleges som eit prosjekt fordig eg ser ingen kvalitet. HVORFOR KAN IKKJE det være likt på entgelsk og norsk wiktinary? også eit problem eg har med den engelske wiktinary er at den viser meg ord på andre språk en norsk. Eg ønsker å diskriminere andre språk. Eg ønsker basicly ein 1:1 norsk engelsk ordbok. Er dette mulig? Så derfor har eg ingen motivasjon eller vilje til å bidra her.
Eg ønsker basically berre ein digital ordbok som er best. Men det er så mange ting her som er lav kvalitet. Hadde ein mal hjolpet for å beskrive sider som er dårligere en engelsk slikt at man kan slette dem? Eg veit ikkje. Johshh (diskusjon) 25. mar. 2025 kl. 23:08 (CET)
The proposed modifications to the Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelines and the U4C Charter are now on Meta-wiki for community notice in advance of the voting period. This final draft was developed from the previous two rounds of community review. Community members will be able to vote on these modifications starting on 17 April 2025. The vote will close on 1 May 2025, and results will be announced no later than 12 May 2025. The U4C election period, starting with a call for candidates, will open immediately following the announcement of the review results. More information will be posted on the wiki page for the election soon.
Please be advised that this process will require more messages to be sent here over the next two months.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. This annual review was planned and implemented by the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, you may review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
-- In cooperation with the U4C, Keegan (WMF) (talk) 4. apr. 2025 kl. 04:05 (CEST)
(Apologies for posting in English)
Hello everyone, I am excited to share news of an upcoming online event called Wikidata and Sister Projects celebrating the different ways Wikidata can be used to support or enhance with another Wikimedia project. The event takes place over 4 days between May 29 - June 1st, 2025.
We would like to invite speakers to present at this community event, to hear success stories, challenges, showcase tools or projects you may be working on, where Wikidata has been involved in Wikipedia, Commons, WikiSource and all other WM projects.
If you are interested in attending, please register here. If you would like to speak at the event, please fill out this Session Proposal template on the event talk page, where you can also ask any questions you may have.
I hope to see you at the event, in the audience or as a speaker, - MediaWiki message delivery (diskusjon) 11. apr. 2025 kl. 11:19 (CEST)
The voting period for the revisions to the Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelines ("UCoC EG") and the UCoC's Coordinating Committee Charter is open now through the end of 1 May (UTC) (find in your time zone). Read the information on how to participate and read over the proposal before voting on the UCoC page on Meta-wiki.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. This annual review of the EG and Charter was planned and implemented by the U4C. Further information will be provided in the coming months about the review of the UCoC itself. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, you may review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
In cooperation with the U4C -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17. apr. 2025 kl. 02:35 (CEST)
The voting period for the revisions to the Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelines and U4C Charter closes on 1 May 2025 at 23:59 UTC (find in your time zone). Read the information on how to participate and read over the proposal before voting on the UCoC page on Meta-wiki.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. This annual review was planned and implemented by the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, you may review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community in your language, as appropriate, so they can participate as well.
In cooperation with the U4C --
(Apologies for posting in English)
Hi all! We have good news to share regarding the ongoing problem with graphs and charts affecting all wikis that use them.
As you probably know, the old Graph extension was disabled in 2023 due to security reasons. We’ve worked in these two years to find a solution that could replace the old extension, and provide a safer and better solution to users who wanted to showcase graphs and charts in their articles. We therefore developed the Charts extension, which will be replacing the old Graph extension and potentially also the EasyTimeline extension.
After successfully deploying the extension on Italian, Swedish, and Hebrew Wikipedia, as well as on MediaWiki.org, as part of a pilot phase, we are now happy to announce that we are moving forward with the next phase of deployment, which will also include your wiki.
The deployment will happen in batches, and will start from May 6. Please, consult our page on MediaWiki.org to discover when the new Charts extension will be deployed on your wiki. You can also consult the documentation about the extension on MediaWiki.org.
If you have questions, need clarifications, or just want to express your opinion about it, please refer to the project’s talk page on Mediawiki.org, or ping me directly under this thread. If you encounter issues using Charts once it gets enabled on your wiki, please report it on the talk page or at Phabricator.
Thank you in advance! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 6. mai 2025 kl. 17:07 (CEST)
Resultatene etter avstemningen for Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelines og Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee-charteret (U4C) er tilgjengelig på Meta-Wiki.
Du kan nå melde seg som kandidat til å være del av U4C til og med 29. mai 2025, kl. 12:00 UTC. Informasjon om kriterier, prosess og tidslinjen er tilgjengelig på Meta-Wiki. Avstemning åpnes 1. juni 2025 og varer to uker, fram til 15. juni 2025, kl. 12:00 UTC.
Har du spørsmål, kan disse stilles på diskusjonssiden til valget. – i samarbeid med U4C,
Keegan (WMF) (diskusjon) 16. mai 2025 kl. 00:08 (CEST)
(Apologies for posting in English, if this is not your first language)
Hello all! We opened a discussion on Meta about a very delicate issue for the development of Abstract Wikipedia: where to store the abstract content that will be developed through functions from Wikifunctions and data from Wikidata. Since some of the hypothesis involve your project, we wanted to hear your thoughts too.
We want to make the decision process clear: we do not yet know which option we want to use, which is why we are consulting here. We will take the arguments from the Wikimedia communities into account, and we want to consult with the different communities and hear arguments that will help us with the decision. The decision will be made and communicated after the consultation period by the Foundation.
You can read the various hypothesis and have your say at Abstract Wikipedia/Location of Abstract Content. Thank you in advance! -- Sannita (WMF) (diskusjon) 22. mai 2025 kl. 17:27 (CEST)
Dear all,
This year, the term of 2 (two) Community- and Affiliate-selected Trustees on the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees will come to an end . The Board invites the whole movement to participate in this year’s selection process and vote to fill those seats.
The Elections Committee will oversee this process with support from Foundation staff . The Governance Committee, composed of trustees who are not candidates in the 2025 community-and-affiliate-selected trustee selection process (Raju Narisetti, Shani Evenstein Sigalov, Lorenzo Losa, Kathy Collins, Victoria Doronina and Esra’a Al Shafei) , is tasked with providing Board oversight for the 2025 trustee selection process and for keeping the Board informed. More details on the roles of the Elections Committee, Board, and staff are here .
Here are the key planned dates:
Learn more about the 2025 selection process - including the detailed timeline, the candidacy process, the campaign rules, and the voter eligibility criteria - on this Meta-wiki page .
Call for Questions
In each selection process, the community has the opportunity to submit questions for the Board of Trustees candidates to answer. The Election Committee selects questions from the list developed by the community for the candidates to answer. Candidates must answer all the required questions in the application in order to be eligible; otherwise their application will be disqualified. This year, the Election Committee will select 5 questions for the candidates to answer. The selected questions may be a combination of what’s been submitted from the community, if they’re alike or related.
Election Volunteers
Another way to be involved with the 2025 selection process is to be an Election Volunteer. Election Volunteers are a bridge between the Elections Committee and their respective community. They help ensure their community is represented and mobilize them to vote. Learn more about the program and how to join on this Meta-wiki page .
Thank you!
https://meta.wikimedia.orghttps://dictious.com/no/Wikimedia_Foundation_elections/2022/Results
https://foundation.wikimedia.orghttps://dictious.com/no/Committee:Elections_Committee_Charter
https://meta.wikimedia.orghttps://dictious.com/no/Wikimedia_Foundation_elections_committee/Roles
https://meta.wikimedia.orghttps://dictious.com/no/Wikimedia_Foundation_elections/2025/FAQ
Best regards,
Victoria Doronina
Board Liaison to the Elections Committee
Governance Committee
MediaWiki message delivery (diskusjon) 28. mai 2025 kl. 05:08 (CEST)
Apologies for writing in English. Hjelp til med å oversette til ditt språk
Eligible voters are asked to participate in the 2025 Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee election. More information–including an eligibility check, voting process information, candidate information, and a link to the vote–are available on Meta at the 2025 Election information page. The vote closes on 17 June 2025 at 12:00 UTC.
Please vote if your account is eligible. Results will be available by 1 July 2025. -- In cooperation with the U4C, Keegan (WMF) (talk) 14. jun. 2025 kl. 01:01 (CEST)Hello all,
The call for candidates for the 2025 Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees selection is now open from June 17, 2025 – July 2, 2025 at 11:59 UTC . The Board of Trustees oversees the Wikimedia Foundation's work, and each Trustee serves a three-year term . This is a volunteer position.
This year, the Wikimedia community will vote in late August through September 2025 to fill two (2) seats on the Foundation Board. Could you – or someone you know – be a good fit to join the Wikimedia Foundation's Board of Trustees?
Learn more about what it takes to stand for these leadership positions and how to submit your candidacy on this Meta-wiki page or encourage someone else to run in this year's election.
Best regards,
Abhishek Suryawanshi
Chair of the Elections Committee
On behalf of the Elections Committee and Governance Committee
https://foundation.wikimedia.orghttps://dictious.com/no/Legal:Bylaws#(B)_Term.
MediaWiki message delivery (diskusjon) 17. jun. 2025 kl. 19:44 (CEST)
Dear Wikimedia Community,
The Community Affairs Committee (CAC) of the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees assigned the Sister Projects Task Force (SPTF) to update and implement a procedure for assessing the lifecycle of Sister Projects – wiki projects supported by Wikimedia Foundation (WMF).
A vision of relevant, accessible, and impactful free knowledge has always guided the Wikimedia Movement. As the ecosystem of Wikimedia projects continues to evolve, it is crucial that we periodically review existing projects to ensure they still align with our goals and community capacity.
Despite their noble intent, some projects may no longer effectively serve their original purpose. Reviewing such projects is not about giving up – it's about responsible stewardship of shared resources. Volunteer time, staff support, infrastructure, and community attention are finite, and the non-technical costs tend to grow significantly as our ecosystem has entered a different age of the internet than the one we were founded in. Supporting inactive projects or projects that didn't meet our ambitions can unintentionally divert these resources from areas with more potential impact.
Moreover, maintaining projects that no longer reflect the quality and reliability of the Wikimedia name stands for, involves a reputational risk. An abandoned or less reliable project affects trust in the Wikimedia movement.
Lastly, failing to sunset or reimagine projects that are no longer working can make it much harder to start new ones. When the community feels bound to every past decision – no matter how outdated – we risk stagnation. A healthy ecosystem must allow for evolution, adaptation, and, when necessary, letting go. If we create the expectation that every project must exist indefinitely, we limit our ability to experiment and innovate.
Because of this, SPTF reviewed two requests concerning the lifecycle of the Sister Projects to work through and demonstrate the review process. We chose Wikispore as a case study for a possible new Sister Project opening and Wikinews as a case study for a review of an existing project. Preliminary findings were discussed with the CAC, and a community consultation on both proposals was recommended.
The application to consider Wikispore was submitted in 2019. SPTF decided to review this request in more depth because rather than being concentrated on a specific topic, as most of the proposals for the new Sister Projects are, Wikispore has the potential to nurture multiple start-up Sister Projects.
After careful consideration, the SPTF has decided not to recommend Wikispore as a Wikimedia Sister Project. Considering the current activity level, the current arrangement allows better flexibility and experimentation while WMF provides core infrastructural support.
We acknowledge the initiative's potential and seek community input on what would constitute a sufficient level of activity and engagement to reconsider its status in the future.
As part of the process, we shared the decision with the Wikispore community and invited one of its leaders, Pharos, to an SPTF meeting.
Currently, we especially invite feedback on measurable criteria indicating the project's readiness, such as contributor numbers, content volume, and sustained community support. This would clarify the criteria sufficient for opening a new Sister Project, including possible future Wikispore re-application. However, the numbers will always be a guide because any number can be gamed.
We chose to review Wikinews among existing Sister Projects because it is the one for which we have observed the highest level of concern in multiple ways.
Since the SPTF was convened in 2023, its members have asked for the community's opinions during conferences and community calls about Sister Projects that did not fulfil their promise in the Wikimedia movement. Wikinews was the leading candidate for an evaluation because people from multiple language communities proposed it. Additionally, by most measures, it is the least active Sister Project, with the greatest drop in activity over the years.
While the Language Committee routinely opens and closes language versions of the Sister Projects in small languages, there has never been a valid proposal to close Wikipedia in major languages or any project in English. This is not true for Wikinews, where there was a proposal to close English Wikinews, which gained some traction but did not result in any action, see section 5 as well as a draft proposal to close all languages of Wikinews.
Initial metrics compiled by WMF staff also support the community's concerns about Wikinews.
Based on this report, SPTF recommends a community reevaluation of Wikinews. We conclude that its current structure and activity levels are the lowest among the existing sister projects. SPTF also recommends pausing the opening of new language editions while the consultation runs.
SPTF brings this analysis to a discussion and welcomes discussions of alternative outcomes, including potential restructuring efforts or integration with other Wikimedia initiatives.
Options mentioned so far (which might be applied to just low-activity languages or all languages) include but are not limited to:
Your insights and perspectives are invaluable in shaping the future of these projects. We encourage all interested community members to share their thoughts on the relevant discussion pages or through other designated feedback channels.
We'd be grateful if you want to take part in a conversation on the future of these projects and the review process. We are setting up two different project pages: Public consultation about Wikispore and Public consultation about Wikinews. Please participate between 27 June 2025 and 27 July 2025, after which we will summarize the discussion to move forward. You can write in your own language.
I will also host a community conversation 16th July Wednesday 11.00 UTC and 17th July Thursday 17.00 UTC (call links to follow shortly) and will be around at Wikimania for more discussions.
-- Victoria on behalf of the Sister Project Task Force, 27. jun. 2025 kl. 22:58 (CEST)
(Apologies for posting in English, you can help by translating into your language)
Hello everyone, the Wikidata For Wikimedia Projects team is excited to announce an upcoming change in how Wikidata edit changelogs are displayed in your Watchlists and Recent Changes lists. If an edit is made on Wikidata that affects a page in another Wikimedia Project, the changelog will contain some information about the nature of the edit. This can include a QID (or Q-number), a PID (or P-number) and a value (which can be text, numbers, dates, or also QID or PID’s). Confused by these terms? See the Wikidata:Glossary for further explanations.
The upcoming change is scheduled for 17.07.2025, between 1300 - 1500 UTC.
The change will display the label (item name) alongside any QID or PIDs, as seen in the image below:
These changes will only be visible if you have Wikidata edits enabled in your User Preferences for Watchlists and Recent Changes, or have the active filter ‘Wikidata edits’ checkbox toggled on, directly on the Watchlist and Recent Changes pages.
Your bot and gadget may be affected! There are thousands of bots, gadgets and user-scripts and whilst we have researched potential effects to many of them, we cannot guarantee there won’t be some that are broken or affected by this change.
Further information and context about this change, including how your bot may be affected can be found on this project task page. We welcome your questions and feedback, please write to us on this dedicated Talk page.
Thank you, - Danny Benjafield (WMDE) on behalf of the Wikidata For Wikimedia Projects Team. MediaWiki message delivery (diskusjon) 14. jul. 2025 kl. 14:46 (CEST)