Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/dʰéǵʰōm. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/dʰéǵʰōm, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/dʰéǵʰōm in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/dʰéǵʰōm you have here. The definition of the word Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/dʰéǵʰōm will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofReconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/dʰéǵʰōm, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
However, Kloekhorst argues that the Sanskrit and Anatolian evidence point towards a reconstruction of the root *dʰeǵ- as opposed to *dʰeǵʰ- on the basis that:
In the Sanskrit oblique stem jm-, -j- must reflect *ǵ-, and cannot reflect *ǵʰ-, which would regularly give -h- in all positions.
The long vowel in the Hittite nom. sg. suggests a "voiced unaspirated" (pre-glottalised) velar. See Kloekhorst (2012).
The *ǵʰ- reconstructable from Latin, Germanic and Greek can be explained in the glottalic theory as a simplification of the cluster *dʰǵ /dˀɡ/ to *dʰǵʰ /dɡ/. The opposite development is much less likely.
It should be noted, however, that the glottalic theory is not generally accepted.
A phonetically difficult but possible connection is with *(s)teǵ-(“to cover”), with devoicing of *dʰ to *t via Siebs' law.
Martirosyan, Hrach (2010) “c‘amak‘”, in Etymological Dictionary of the Armenian Inherited Lexicon (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series; 8), Leiden and Boston: Brill, pages 621–623