Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/korľь. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/korľь, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/korľь in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/korľь you have here. The definition of the word Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/korľь will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofReconstruction:Proto-Slavic/korľь, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
The shift from hard o-stem to the soft jo-stem, as outlined in the chronology above, has several theories of origin:
Holzer explains the j-suffix as originating from a substantivized possessive adjective
Schenker suggests analogical replacement after agent nouns ending in *-teľь or other words denoting leaders such as *cěsařь and *kъnędzь
Pronk-Tiethoff suggests the final *-ľь is due to the fact that Proto-Slavs likely perceived the Old High German final consonant as soft, similarly as in the loanword *grędeľь.
The word has been described as "without doubt the most famous Germanic loanword in Slavic" (Pronk-Tiethoff 2013) due to the fact that it's the only loanword in Slavic that can actually be dated, thus giving clues to the absolute dating of Proto-Slavic phonological developments. The fact that it regularly underwent historical Proto-Slavic sound laws, and that it's reflected in all three branches, is one of the chief indications to date Late Proto-Slavic (Common Slavic) to the ninth century.
However, this is comparatively late (only a century before Old Church Slavonic manuscripts were written), so other etymologies have been suggested:
Holzer derives it from the name of the Frankish ruler Charles Martel (688-741). The issue with this theory is that Charles Martel was not particularly important to the contemporary Slavs.
Stender-Petersen derives it from Proto-Germanic*kar(i)laz(“free man”) (Old High German karl(“man”)) with a semantic shift explained as "very ordinary".
These theories are generally thought of as less convincing than from Karl "Charlemagne", who was an actual king of (some) Slavs.