Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:account. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:account, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:account in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:account you have here. The definition of the word Talk:account will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:account, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Word in Dutch as "English loanword"?
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
How official is "account" in Dutch? If it's not a widely used term then I can surely say we have it in Danish as well - probably in many other languages too. If this is the case, what do we do? "Multiple languages"? Remove the Dutch entry? --213.237.66.15516:53, 21 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Why are there multiple etymologies indicated for the English word if they (i.e. both the noun and the verb) state the same origin? I would say there is only one etymology here, resulting in a noun and a verb in the current practice. --Providus12:40, 2 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Definition 4 & 5 looks the same to me. In general, 21st Century wording would be a fine thing. The entry looks like it was written 200 years ago in some respects. Mglovesfun (talk) 18:39, 15 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Possible derived terms from Chambers 1908
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I would say this is sub sense 7 of verb sense 1, as ‘accounting’ means ‘giving a reason’. ‘accounting for’ could be rephrased as ‘taking into account’ with ‘account’ used as in noun sense 1 sub sense 4 to mean ‘consideration’ Overlordnat1 (talk) 02:21, 2 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
The sense of “a business relationship involving the exchange of money and credit” has been questioned. (See Tea room/2021/January#The page account houses dark definitions, ....) I can’t say the sense does not exist or the definition is incorrect because I don’t understand it at all – unless bank account is meant, but that sense is already covered. So the best seems to be to bring it up here; if cites can be found attesting this sense, they can help to construct an understandable definition. --Lambiam17:31, 9 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Attesting quotations are definitely needed, but it seems to me that that sense is plausible. One might have a trading account with one’s stockbroker, whereby the stockbroker acts on one’s behalf to buy and sell securities for a fee, for example. — SGconlaw (talk) 19:02, 9 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Well, at least it is plausible now what was being meant. The suggestion of such a meaning is of course supported by the noun being used with “with”. Though this “with” may mean apud, bei, so we have to ask whether all these texts could also use “at” as easily.
The first quote at first glance is quite convincing, as they expound the circumstances that “A media vehicle will not sell space directly to a client or to an agency with which it has not had prior dealings” – but this is a breviloquence for saying if the ad agency is not found in the accounting books already. One wouldn’t ever say this in reference to someone who does not keep books, e.g. “*I have to buy my nose candy through another dealer that has an account with the importer.”
But in the second quote it is immediately clear that a user-profile is meant, at online payment services – as is strongly suggested by the word “creating”, which can be used for relationships in general, but the whole context makes clear it is a user profile (the sense we currently inaccurately define as “an authorization to use a service”). If a company has a user profile there are of course always “business relationships” if only in the legal sense but such a meaning must not be just a reflex.
The same is to be said of the third quote: It is meant very technically, computing-related: the accounts are opened, and the next sentence is about “opening accounts with these companies their respective websites”. Conceiving this use of “accounts” as business relationships just “opened” at websites, all at once with all shipping companies, is too weird to be truly meant.
I think I will have to concur with @Lambiam that this meaning is not cited but disproven. If there were such a sense one would find more than such middling copyread books. Fay Freak (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
The "business relationship" definition might need some improved wording, but it seems to aim at something more significant that the record of transactions involving the parties in the business relationship. The purpose of the relationship is transactions, which are recorded. The account relationship may imply a certain level of trust, but there are plenty of COD accounts, for which the level of trust ("credit") extended is limited to the cost of a delivery stop, eg, what if the customer orders something, but doesn't have the money to pay at time of delivery?. A business relationship can involve more than the recorded transactions, eg, either customer or vendor may provide information to the other party that is not essential to any transaction, such as about competitors.
Which of our definitions is appropriate for the common collocations open/have/get/close an account . Obviously not all such accounts are bank accounts. All bank accounts seem to me to fit into the business relationship definition, so "bank account" seems like a subsense or an "especially".
The media on/in which the specifics of the transactions are recorded is immaterial in current usage.
RFV-resolved. After reading the comments, I believe that this definition and the "computing" definition are both trying to capture the same meaning, where this one is a bit too broad and the "computing" sense is too narrow. I have moved the citations to the computing sense, and reworded it to be a bit broader. Kiwima (talk) 01:46, 22 January 2021 (UTC)Reply