Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word User talk:Overlordnat1. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word User talk:Overlordnat1, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say User talk:Overlordnat1 in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word User talk:Overlordnat1 you have here. The definition of the word User talk:Overlordnat1 will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofUser talk:Overlordnat1, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
If you are unfamiliar with wiki-editing, take a look at Help:How to edit a page. It is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.
These links may help you familiarize yourself with Wiktionary:
Entry layout (EL) is a detailed policy on Wiktionary's page formatting; all entries must conform to it. The easiest way to start off is to copy the contents of an existing same-language entry, and then adapt it to fit the entry you are creating.
Check out Language considerations to find out more about how to edit for a particular language.
Our Criteria for Inclusion (CFI) defines exactly which words can be added to Wiktionary; the most important part is that Wiktionary only accepts words that have been in somewhat widespread use over the course of at least a year, and citations that demonstrate usage can be asked for when there is doubt.
Re "not much in it": is this the same "in" as "there might be something in that" (i.e. good idea)? Thus should be covered at "in" somehow? Equinox◑10:34, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
That’s an interesting take on things. I was thinking about using ‘in it’ to refer to a difference in time or distance, such as ‘I nearly travelled as far as I did last time but there’s not much in it’ or ‘I nearly went as quickly as last time but there’s not much in it’ but if we take it to mean that the distance is unimportant then I suppose it is the same sense, as ‘there’s something in it’ means ‘there’s something important in it’. On the other hand you could replace ‘it’ with something like ‘what he’s saying’ in the sentence ‘there’s something in it’ but what could you replace ‘it’ with in the phrase ‘there’s not much in it’? ‘not much in it’ and ‘something in it’ both feel idiomatic rather than SOP to me but perhaps they could be dealt with by adding to the in or in it entries? Overlordnat1 (talk) 10:58, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
It would be an honour to get such a promotion, as it were. If I did become an administrator, I’d behave consensually and responsibly. I hereby accept your offer. Overlordnat1 (talk) 12:16, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Can you change the first ===Etymology=== to ===Etymology 1=== and "nest" everything inside both etymology sections accordingly? Thanks! Amusingly, I noticed this not by seeing your edit, but by happening to be going through a semi-regular WT:TODO check for instances of "Etymology 2" without a preceding "Etymology 1", ha. - -sche(discuss)18:59, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Where did you get that from, that people calling for Israel to leave the occupied territories but still support its continued existence don’t normally consider themselves to be Zionist, nor are they usually considered to be such by others?
On top of that, just continuation of a Jewish state in Israel in its current territory or Israeli expansion is semantically redundant. There is no 'or'. Israeli expansion by itself implies the continuation of a state in the area. It's like saying "paying with money or cash". Shoshin000 (talk) 14:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC)