Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:good. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:good, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:good in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:good you have here. The definition of the word Talk:good will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:good, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Foreign langauge examples
Latest comment: 21 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The usage "the good" (as in "the best is the enemy of the good") probably doesn't need separate mention. The constructuon works for most adjectives, and it's documented in the entry for the. -dmh 06:04, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Examples
How about do-goodergoodie two-shoesgood for the soul?--Rich Farmbrough 19:08, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
These should get their own entries, tagged as idioms, and should appear in the "Related terms" section here. -dmh 06:04, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Translations section
Latest comment: 19 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Something doesn't work with the Translations. If I click on "Norwegian: god" (good in Norwegian), I get the page for "God" (the Lord, etc,you know.) — This unsigned comment was added by 84.183.149.127 (talk) at 15:33, 6 June 2005 (UTC).Reply
Noun
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
I have corrected this section. My reasons are:
Good is only used in the singular as relating to evil, outcomes or in the subjective sense, therefore I removed the reference to the plural. One never refers to "the forces of goods" or "the results were goods".
The collective noun "goods" has a different and unrelated etymology compared to the adjective "good" and its derivative noun. Goods comes from the dutch word "goedere", meaning wares.
The words good and goods are unrelated and should therefore not be defined on the same page. This will only lead to confusion.
People increasingly do talk about "a good", but it's not correct to do so. Strictly speaking, 'goods' as a noun meaning wares or merchandise cannot be singularised and generally defines an unspecified quantity of materials. If one single type of material is being referenced then 'commodity' will do. One item is, well, an 'item'. I don't yet have an authority to quote on this (I'll update when I can), but for now I think if you check most respected dictionaries such as Oxford, Collins and American Heritage, you'll notice that none include 'good' as a singular noun in this sense. - Shrivenzale08:32, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The Dutch word goed and goede is ethical : 1 'vechten voor het goede' & 2'ik ben goed en niet slecht' meaning 'fight for the good' & 'I am good and not evil'. It also is 'Useful for a particular purpose'. Mallerd14:13, 10 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
JW cameo?
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
What's that quote of Jimmy Wales' interview doing under Adverb : Well? Although I guess he's a force of goodness, so he belongs there :) — This unsigned comment was added by 82.79.25.125 (talk) at 15:27, 6 June 2008 (UTC).Reply
Request for verification
Latest comment: 15 years ago8 comments5 people in discussion
I suppose I don't find that very convincing on its own. Do you think you could find a real usage that makes the same point? Equinox◑00:31, 6 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
Maybe in “such a ‘good’ girl,” but not “such a good girl”. Anything can mean its opposite when spoken facetiously, but I don't think that's really a sense of the word in isolation. I'd like to see some real examples, too. —MichaelZ. 2009-03-06 03:44 z
We often contrast good girl with nice girl. A nice girl is girl with a strong moral center, while a good girl lacks self-respect and a moral code and thus is easy to bed. Boys want to date a good girl, but marry a nice girl. —Stephen19:51, 6 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
Okay, so “good girl” means one thing among college boys at the bar, and another from a dad to his two-year-old. But still, I suspect this applies to almost any adjective with positive or negative connotation (“bad girl” – does bad#Etymology 2 warrant a separate etymology?). Do we have any guidelines on how to handle ironic usage of words? If the former sense is common enough that it can be attested, then it should be attested, and perhaps clarified with a context label or usage note for foreign-language learners. —MichaelZ. 2009-03-11 06:03 z
The good thing about RfV is that, after a decent interval, no less than 4 weeks, an entry or sense that nobody takes the trouble to cite is deleted without the need for further discussion. I personally rarely (but sometimes) find it desirable, let alone necessary, to include ironic use.
It is also very tedious to cite such usage, sometimes requiring looking at hundreds of snippets to find clear ironic use. The problem is severe with unusual senses of common polysemic words like this one. DCDuringTALK15:09, 11 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I often hear the word "good" used in two ways which are not presently mentioned in this Wiktionary entry.
1) "Are you good?" is asked of people who fall over or drop something. In this case, "good" means "okay". I've personally only heard this usage among young people in Eastern Ontario, where I currently work.
2) "Are you good?" is asked between parties involved in a task before some stage of said task is begun. Example: An MC asks the chef if he is "good" before announcing the start of a meal, to be sure the food is ready to be served. In this case, "good" is a contraction of "good to go," and means "ready." — This unsigned comment was added by 66.102.65.42 (talk) at 18:21, 5 July 2011 (UTC).Reply
#1 seems very similar to some senses we have (e.g. the "healthful" or "competent" in "How are you? / I'm good", but it does appear to be more or less distinct from them. Ditto #2 I suppose. I imagine it might be difficult to cite these (WT:CFI), though having said that there are a lot of modern books with informal dialogue. Equinox◑19:01, 5 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
how do I add comparative and superlative in Irish language
Latest comment: 12 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
I want to add comparative and superlative for "maith" (Irish language for "good")
as is shown for English:
good (comparative better, superlative best)
but I don't know how to do this in Irish, even though I tried looking at some other Irish examples. I tried looking at the English in edit mode but it contains the word "en-adj" in this area, and I assume this would not be appropriate for Irish.
The Irish translation is:
maith (comparative níos fearr, superlative is fearr)
You could do {{head|ga|noun|g=f|comparative|''']'''|superlative|fearr}}, having said that, maith already lists fearr in its declension template. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:24, 11 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, the entry for the English word good is not the place to be adding the comparative/superlative of maith, and it's already at the entry for the Irish word. —Angr13:34, 13 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thank you both for your comments; I've used that method for adding comparative and superlative forms to some of the more common Irish adjectives: maith (good), mór (big), beag (small), láidir (strong) —Dolphin390022:52, 6 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
"Good" as the result of the Neophitic formula for analyzing social imapact.
Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
In the area of the world I'm in (Pacific Northwest, USA), there's a local ethics-based religion called Neophism that regularly references Good as the result of an equation that is Good=(New Quantity of choices/Original Quantity of choices) * (Weighted Approval of those affected / Weighted Disapproval of those affected). Should this be given as an entry? --50.46.215.2820:14, 28 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
Neophism does not seem big enough to be notable. Also it does not sound like a new meaning of "good", just a new way to measure goodness. Equinox◑20:25, 28 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
GOOD: item of merchandise
GOODS:
A. merchandise (takes a sg/pl vb)
B. Pl Noun
1. commercial fabrics (takes a sg/pl vb)
2. portable personal property (takes a pl vb)
3. incriminating evidence (slang) (takes a pl vb)
4. something promised: something promised or expected (informal) (takes a plural verb)You can rely on her to come up with the goods.
Microsoft® Encarta® 2009
"Do good" is SoP. "Do-gooder" is not, because that's not a normal construction (you'd expect "good-doer" or "doer of good"). Equinox◑18:31, 5 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
1. profit or advantage; worth; benefit: (used with negative words, or in questions) What good will that do? 2. excellence or merit; kindness: to do good. --Backinstadiums (talk) 16:24, 28 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence. Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
This entry, or one or more of its senses, has been nominated as derogatory pursuant to WT:DEROGATORY. It may be speedily deleted if it does not have at least three quotations meeting the attestation requirements within two weeks of the nomination date, that is, by 29 September 2022.
Apparently in reference to white supremacists saying the only good nigger is a dead nigger, but if so we probably need to provide some more context as to how/when it’s used in the form of context labels/usage notes. I’m sceptical, and I have a feeling this was added by the racist IP. Theknightwho (talk) 11:51, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply