Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
User talk:KovachevBot. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
User talk:KovachevBot, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
User talk:KovachevBot in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
User talk:KovachevBot you have here. The definition of the word
User talk:KovachevBot will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
User talk:KovachevBot, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Thank you for the anagrams, @KovachevBot! May your gears turn ever so efficiently ;-) Chernorizets (talk) 05:37, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
- @Chernorizets: Beep-boop. Thank-you... cordially... for your... gratitudes... it is... my... pleasure... beep-boop. Thank you, for... being... an... absolute legend... KovachevBot (talk) 21:26, 3 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
- Also, we're technically done with the anagram run! It ran surprisingly fast, and unfortunately I didn't record how many edits it did, but... I think it was maybe near 2000 1000 or so. No non-lemmas were included, so let me know what you think. We should pay some attention to the anagrams sections and see how they reflect on the entries as a whole. I've seen a good few interesting connections so far, like енцефаломенингоцеле and менингоенцефалоцеле (shockingly, we cover neither of these!)... in all seriousness I hope it'll look good in the end, lol. Kiril kovachev (talk・contribs) 21:29, 3 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
- @Kiril kovachev I've been spot-checking examples - so far so good; there was one odd example, but it's not a big deal. Left you a message on your talk page. Cheers! Chernorizets (talk) 08:14, 4 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
- @Chernorizets Thanks, I better check these out as well. Later today I think I'll write that script to filter out the dubious ones, although I don't trust myself to remove content bot-wise, so I'll just remove it by hand once I find the errors. There are lots that are just "the same word but with a hyphen at the end", which I think we need to axe... Kiril kovachev (talk・contribs) 11:54, 4 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi Kiril kovachev. I see that your bot has added a misspelling as an anagram here. The misspelling has its entry, so I guess is is considered a word? And therefore a valid anagram? Regards, and have a good one. Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 13:31, 16 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
- @Rui Gabriel Correia Hi! I'm not sure what to do about cases like these. The pool of possible anagrams was taken directly from existing entries on Wiktionary, and there was no logic applied on top to check whether the word was a misspelling or not. The page Wiktionary:Anagrams does not say anything about whether they should be allowed, but if you'd like, you can decide whether to remove that particular one, if you think it's unfitting. :) Kiril kovachev (talk・contribs) 17:02, 21 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
- Hi Kovachev. Tanks for your informative response. Certainly an interesting case. I will let it stand and see if any light shines through. Have a great week. Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 16:10, 22 April 2025 (UTC)Reply