Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:mother. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:mother, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:mother in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:mother you have here. The definition of the word Talk:mother will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:mother, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Translations
Latest comment: 19 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
*]: ]<!--is this "mother" or "mamma"?-->
To the anonymous commenter I'm fairly sure that it means "mother" and I'm surprised that you would make such a facile assumption (i.e. that it meant "mamma"). However, I'm not an authority on Tok Pisin so I haven't moved it. —Moilleadóir10:32, 23 August 2005 (UTC)Reply
Not an etymology?
Latest comment: 19 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
(Currently 1.4 in the contents) Does this have any meaning at all? Doesn't look much like Arabic.
I don't know i suppose head of a convent (where strictly "abbess" or not i don't know). i came to wiktionary to understand when some nuns are titled "mother" as opposed to "sister" (didn't find much help on wikipedia.org either). thanks for responding.--98.116.115.18007:18, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
The head of a convent is called "Mother Superior". Correct. The other nuns are all called "sisters", as far as I know. That's somewhat different from the usage in male convents, where the priests are called "father" and the non-ordained members are called "brothers". — This unsigned comment was added by 82.83.205.123 (talk) at 23:17, 13 May 2013 (UTC).Reply
Picture
Latest comment: 15 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion
The Flickr caption for the photo on here presently says
I feel that a simple mother-and-baby picture may be better, because that painting seems to suggest royalty/monarchy more than motherhood. Equinox◑19:54, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
The existing picture is adequate; the Marie-Therese introduces even more extraneous elements. A picture that would be more unambiguously about the central/etymological concept (see below) of "mother" might show some animal giving birth or suckling young. I doubt that a picture is particularly helpful for this entry anyway. DCDuringTALK17:04, 15 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago14 comments4 people in discussion
Would there be any problem universalising (species-wise) sense 1 by changing
"A female that conceives, gives birth to, or raises a child"
to
"A female that conceives, gives birth to, or raises young"?
(Then we can delete def 5: "A female parent of an animal." and move the quotation ("The lioness was a mother of four cubs.") to sense 1.)
Also, the use of "mother" to mean "pregnant woman" is different enough from the meaning "a female who has given birth to, or raised young"
to require a separate def.--Tyranny Sue05:07, 14 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
We need to make sure that we have the everyday definition in plain language, whatever else we do. There are a proliferation of specific terms for female mammals (some transferable to humans !) that suggests centrality and priority for the human sense, or at the very least its distinctiveness. Many of the synonyms for the human sense are not applicable to the mammal, egg-laying, or sexually reproducing animal senses.
Does one become a "mother" in the pregnant sense at the moment of fertilization (so one could discover that one had become a mother at some later time) or is it more socially defined, as when one is "showing"? DCDuringTALK17:20, 15 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
It is a bit of a dilemma. I mean, calling a woman a 'mother' just because she has conceived (though people do it) is fairly premature - she might not (for a range of reasons) carry the fetus to term, and then she would no longer be referred to as a 'mother'. Whereas someone who's given birth (to live young) is more permanently considered a mother (even if her offspring dies later).
With the species issue, if our first def is about humans exclusively, shouldn't it be something more like "A female human who conceives, gives birth to..."? (Not 'woman' because fairly young girls can conceive.)--Tyranny Sue05:48, 16 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Our definitions have to capture usage. There are contexts where a mother-to-be is called a mother because there is no alternative that is brief (<four syllables), readily understood, and emotionally rich. But well-crafted definitions seem to use defining words and wording that approximate the ambiguities of usage.
Longmans' DCD (1987) includes both humans and animals in the wording of sense 1. MW3 says "woman", but has a chimp among its usage examples. We have the potential to do better, but it isn't easy. DCDuringTALK12:55, 16 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Ok, how would something like "A female who has given birth to a baby or acted as parent to a child. Sometimes extended to include pregnancy." be for sense 1? This would cover the rather redundant sense 2, whose quotations could then be included under sense 1.--Tyranny Sue01:36, 17 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
This is now more about making the definitions more accurate than it is about universalising it (species-wise) but how about:
He had something of his mother in him, but this was because he realized that in the end only her love was unconditional, and in gratitude he had emulated her.
Nutrients and oxygen obtained by the mother are conveyed to the fetus.
1991, Susan Faludi, The Undeclared War Against American Women
The antiabortion iconography in the last decade featured the fetus but never the mother.
That seems quite good. Do folks really use the term mother (or father) about fish, reptiles, amphibians, insects? Isn't it mostly confined to mammals and birds? DCDuringTALK03:49, 17 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Hmm, I would, not that I ever have occasion to. Don't know about most people. In fiction (i.e. movies like 'Finding Nemo', 'Ants', etc) "mother" & "father" are probably used. But I don't think most people have much reason - unless they have such creatures as pets (in which case I'd assume they do) or study them professionally (in which case why not?). Not much of an answer, sorry.
I think it's worth giving "human mother" its own sense, because I imagine that its application to other animals is by extension. Even if that's not the case historically, I feel like it's the case in current usage. (Actually, I think the primary sense is our current sense #2, where "mother" is relative to the son(s) and/or daughter(s), as in "my mother", "their mother", etc. Consider a phrase like "a face that only a mother could love", where "mother" is implied to be the face's owner's mother, even though there's no explicit possessive.) —RuakhTALK14:33, 16 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
In which case perhaps the new defs 1 & 2 should be:
He had something of his mother in him, but this was because he realized that in the end only her love was unconditional, and in gratitude he had emulated her.
(b) My sister-in-law has just become a mother.
(c) Nutrients and oxygen obtained by the mother are conveyed to the fetus.
1991, Susan Faludi, The Undeclared War Against American Women
The antiabortion iconography in the last decade featured the fetus but never the mother.
(Also, I'll add the link to 'animal', which has sense 3 as "In non-scientific usage, any land-living vertebrate (i.e. not birds, fishes, insects etc)" ) --Tyranny Sue04:16, 17 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
So... how would we accomodate this quote: "One can hardly call these changes radical, however, when compared with those caused by the genetic constitution of the mother plant." ? There is a "mother" sense in botany as well as in zoology, but the mother often is not female. --EncycloPetey02:50, 25 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Yes indeed. Also the 'mother' some people use to refer to the starter in brewing and bread-making. I think we need another sense/def for that.--Tyranny Sue01:45, 27 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
I wonder if we could combine some of the figurative anthropomorphic senses and come up with some more modern quotations (as per my new section below, I think 6's quotation is not very helpful, and 7 is pretty questionable too). But we may need to add a few more to cover the "mother plant" & other non-animal biological meanings (e.g. something like "something or someone that gives rise to or exercises protecting care over something else; origin or source" and, separate sense I suppose, "A structure, such as a mother cell, from which other similar bodies are formed").
The fermenting sense ("a stringy, mucilaginous substance consisting of various bacteria, esp. Mycoderma aceti, that forms on the surface of a fermenting liquid and causes fermentation when added to other liquids, as in changing wine or cider to vinegar. Also called mother of vinegar") is also missing but *may* have a separate etymology (Origin: 1530–40; prob. special use of mother 1 , but perh. another word, akin to D modder dregs, MLG moder swampy land; see mud) so could possibly be listable separately? --Tyranny Sue02:14, 27 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Quotations for senses 6 & 7
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Currently, they are:
6. (figuratively) Any elderly woman, especially within a particular community
Whoever does God's will is my brother and sister and mother. –Mark 3:35, NIV.
7. (figuratively) Any person or entity which performs mothering.
The inhabitants of the villages ceased, they ceased in Israel, until that I Deborah arose, that I arose a mother in Israel. –Judges 5:7, KJV.
Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all. –Galatians 4:26, KJV.
Does it strike anyone else that we could find more appropriate & illustrative quotations in less antiquated language? Especially the one for 6 doesn't seem to me to match the definition.--Tyranny Sue02:08, 27 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps we should start a Citations drive for this word (with notice in the BP), and then sort them to figure out what senses we want. I know several contributors here who might be up for helping on this. How does that sound? --EncycloPetey02:20, 27 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion
subsequently moved to etymology 5
Though etymology 4 is probably a neologism, it is not a protologism — I heard the word spoken over the years in reference to housecats, and it sounded perfectly natural in context. When I recently searched for the word, I couldn't find an existing entry for it at Dictionary.com or in Wiktionary, so I decided to add it here. I'm going under the assumption that the word's usage is not exactly standard or formal, but is likely improvised dialectal, but otherwise I know little about it. - Gilgamesh (talk) 15:10, 24 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
The first link is now dead and the other two use moth-er with a hyphen. Does it exist unhyphenated, or CFI-attestably at all? I briefly searched Google Books for "good mother" in proximity to "mouser" or "cat" and "moths" but found only the usual sense, e.g. a cat acting as a mother to baby squirrels. Equinox◑13:11, 27 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
It's not in Century, which sometimes has citations of obscure things. Century does, however, have something we lack:
mother2 , "n. (Altered, by confusion with mother1, from *mudder, < MD. modder, mud, dregs, lees, D. moer = MLG. moder, moer, dregs, lees, LG. moder (< G. moder, also mutter) = Dan. Sw. mudder, mud, mold; akin to mud, q.v.)
1. Dregs; lees. Near a Nymph with an Urn, that divides the High-way, And into a Puddle throws Mother of Tea. Prior, Down-Hall, st. 15.
2. A stringy, mucilaginous substance which forms in vinegar during the acetous fermentation, and the presence of which sets up and hastens this kind of fermentation. It is produced by a plant, Mycoderma aceti, the germs of which, like those of the yeast-plant, exist in the atmosphere.
Unhappily the bit of mother from Swift's vinegar-barrel has had strength enough to sour all the rest . Lowell, Study Windows, p. 184.
mother2 , v. i. To become concreted, as the thick matter of liquors; become mothery.
They oint their (sheep's) naked limbs with mothered oil. Dryden,
I've redefined and cited 'moth-er'. Googling "amateur mothers" "moths" turns up a handful of (non-durable) hits, which confirm that 'mother' exists and is as broad as I redefined 'moth-er' to be. However, I don't think it meets CFI. I tried the collocations you suggest, as well as "mother(s)"+"mouser(s)" and "amateur mother(s)", on Google Books, Groups, and Issuu. - -sche(discuss)02:55, 28 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This one is at least amusing. It's like saying that English "momma" must be borrowed from Latin "mamma". Why should the everyday usage be derived from a rather literary coinage?
Such a suggestion is especially strange in the proximity of (c) donates a fertilized egg, or (d) donates a body cell which has resulted in a clone. If a person can be validly called a mother without having ever been pregnant, why should calling a pregnant woman a mother be an exception that needs to be explained away by going to such great lengths? A pregnant woman is still "mothering" her child long after a "c)" or "d)" mother has parted ways with it. There's nothing outlandish about this usage. 176.221.124.20722:11, 2 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
I've added two citations to the Citations section at the entry (admittedly one is a pun, but for a pun to work both meanings are activated) - so perhaps if another citation can be located, we're in business.- Sonofcawdrey (talk) 04:03, 4 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
I have now added another citation - from 1949. Should satisfy CFI on this evidence, though only just. I did ask a "mother" I know, and he said the term is commonly used in the community and is currently trying to source a few citations from his library. - Sonofcawdrey (talk) 03:48, 11 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
The plaintive cry "Mother" as used when the eminent destruction of an individual (usually a wimpy man; or a strong man for comedic effect) is close at hand
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I remember not a few cartoons and movies in which a person who is soon to meet their doom cries out for their mother in the manner: "Mother!" (in wimpy tone; not like the vulgar "Mother!"). The one who says this is then killed or retreats from their position. I think this usage should be included on the page somehow; it doesn't really seem to translate into Chinese that well (as far as I can tell) so I think it is a convention of English that might need to be included in a 'usage notes' section. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 14:39, 17 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Etymology for the 'greatest of its kind', 'mother of all x' sense
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
"(dated) A term of address for one's wife." This seems very strange. Could it perhaps refer to how parents may call each other "mum" and "dad" in front of the kids? In that case, we need to make it clear: at present it doesn't even mention the existence of children. Equinox◑01:02, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Indeed. I'm just noting that it's a real thing, unlike some of the entries above, and providing the context around who uses it (older men in certain regions) and how/why to help someone identify likely collocations or contexts that would assist with finding cites. - -sche(discuss)03:14, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Cited. In the 1944 citation the term is used in front of children, in the 1887 the wife is a mother but it's not in front of them, and in the 1922 children don't seem to be involved at all, so overall I don't think it's parallel to that use of mum and dad. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 11:42, 25 March 2023 (UTC)Reply