Forms with movable nu don't show up in search results. Searching e.g. "ἐποίησεν" yields nothing, whereas "ἐποίησε" or "ἐποίησε(ν)" does. I suggest that instead of parentheses fully expanded spelling is used, i.e. "ἐποίησε, ἐποίησεν". --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 07:37, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
In irregular verbs like εἶμι (eîmi), can the module be made to recognize the forms with movable nu (ν) such as εἶσι (eîsi) and give a link to the form with movable nu on the nu, as in {{grc-decl}} (for instance, with αἰξῐ́(ν) in αἴξ (aíx)? At the moment, εἶσι(ν) just links to the nonexistent page εἶσι(ν). The alternative is to say εἶσι/εἶσιν (basically as is done in the table in εἰμί (eimí)). — Eru·tuon 22:57, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Hmm, never mind. Per @Ivan Štambuk's comment above, the table should have expanded spelling. — Eru·tuon 23:00, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
@ObsequiousNewt The template documentation says to use {{grc-conj|pres-con-em|πλ}} and {{grc-conj|imperf-con-em|ἐπλ}} for the present and imperfect of πλέω (pléō), but when I tried to do so I got a module error: diff. Any ideas? —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 17:31, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
{{grc-conj|pres-con-e-mono|πν}}. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 07:10, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
The above comment thread from 2015 leaves me unclear about what's up with this. The documentation gives πλέω as an example of pres-con-e-mono, but in fact that isn't how the entry for πλέω is coded right now. There is also a line in the Lua code that is commented out, in which there is a local variable called "mono" that is set ...? From the documentation, it looks like this is meant for the following six verbs, θέω νέω πλέω πνέω ῥέω χέω , referred to in Smyth 607. I haven't checked all six, but for the ones I checked, none use the "e-mono" stuff. Is there actually any wiktionary entry that does use one of the e-mono conjugation types? If not, then maybe it should just be removed from the documentation.--2607:FB91:1B9C:13B4:B8F3:A642:EA80:A550 17:37, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
@JohnC5, I'm so meta even this acronym, Erutuon, Angr, etc: Each major dialect of Ancient Greek basically has its own separate rules for contraction (Epic/Herodotus doesn't contract but uses ευ when it does, or uses assimilated forms; severe Doric uses η/ίο, Æolic uses athematic verbs...) which makes it very hard to display all possible forms in a single table (or even multiple tables, although that's largely a difficulty in programming) and in any case that's a lot of information to be displayed, especially for a class of verbs that is not only productive but probably the most common type in Greek. Given this, I would like to propose that we display only the Attic contracted forms (alongside the uncontracted forms)—anyone who wants a dialectal form is probably knowledgeable enough to be able to derive it from the uncontracted form. If a dialectal form is attested, it would warrant its own page anyway, and therefore the relevant table can be displayed there instead.
Seems like the parameter |cform= does the opposite of what it should; in ἀφαιρέω (aphairéō) adding |cform=con to the Koine future ἀφελ- (aphel-) makes the template only display uncontracted forms. — Eru·tuon 22:28, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
{{grc-conj}} will have cform= folded into form=. I can fix the old one until I get the new version done. —ObsequiousNewt (εἴρηκα|πεποίηκα) 18:14, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Is there a way to turn off, say, the non-indicative forms for an aorist iterative like φύγεσκον (phúgeskon)?
For that matter, it would be nice to have a way to simply remove the cells for various moods from a table. Say, a parameter |noshow= that takes two letters: then s for subjunctive, o for optative, c for imperative, i for infinitive, n for participle; then a for active, m for middle, p for passive.
I also wish it were possible to specify just active and passive in |form=. And it would make more sense if the parameters were just a, m, and p, and then you'd just choose from those or the combinations am, mp, and ap. It's weird that active and passive have three-letter abbreviations. while active-middle and middle-passive have two letters. — Eru·tuon 21:32, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
ῥῡ́ομαι (rhū́omai) has athematic imperfect and present or perfect forms in addition to thematic present and imperfect: for instance, εἰρύαται (eirúatai), ἔρῡσο (érūso). Cunliffe and LSJ disagree on whether the former is present or perfect. I could encode them using the special form parameter, but it would be nice to have a way to generate them with the template. I think there are other verbs like this, but I can't remember them at the moment. — Eru·tuon 22:08, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
@ObsequiousNewt: The prefix= parameter isn't working at προσεῖπον. Even though I've specified prefix=προσ, the module is still throwing the stress onto the initial syllable in the lines where the augment is contracted with the root-initial vowel. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 07:47, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
@ObsequiousNewt: {{grc-conj|pres-con-o|...}} and {{grc-conj|imperf-con-o|...}} show only the contracted forms, not the uncontracted ones. Is that on purpose? —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 18:53, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
@Erutuon, JohnC5, ObsequiousNewt: The forms of the auxiliary verb in the perfect mediopassive subjunctive and optative now link to the corresponding participle instead of to the verb form itself. For example, at αἰνέω, the 1st singular perfect mediopassive subjunctive ᾐμημένος ὦ is linked as ] ] instead of as ] ]. Is that intentional? Is it a good idea? —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 16:10, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
@Erutuon, JohnC5, ObsequiousNewt: Would it be possible to modify |pres-numi and |imperf-numi to change the ν to λ when the preceding consonant is λ? That would allow us to add the present and imperfect of ὄλλυμι and its compounds. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 20:40, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
@ObsequiousNewt: I have a number of questions on the code, and I will post them here rather than commenting on the code. What do pstem, ctable, and pctable stand for? — Eru·tuon 20:48, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
{{grc-conj|perf||γεγελᾰσ|form=mp}} generates γεγελᾰ́σᾰται; {{grc-conj-perfect-σ||||γεγέλα|γεγελά|γεγελα|form=mp}} generates γεγελασμένοι εἰσί. Which is right? —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 21:17, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Likewise, there's a discrepancy between {{grc-conj|perf||τεθαπ|form=mp}} and {{grc-conj-perfect-labial||||τέθα|τεθά|τεθα|form=mp}}. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 22:17, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Pluperfects too. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 22:25, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
The dialect (|dial=) parameter does not work as I would expect it to. |dial=att or |dial=koi should make {{grc-conj}} display (Attic) and (Koine) as the titleapp text, and cause the table to only have contracted forms, because uncontracted forms are never used in Attic or Koine.
For instance,
{{grc-conj|pres-con-a|form=mid|θε|dial=att}} displays the following:
| number | singular | dual | plural | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| first | second | third | second | third | first | second | third | ||||||
| middle | indicative | θεᾰ́ομαι | θεᾰ́ῃ, θεᾰ́ει |
θεᾰ́εται | θεᾰ́εσθον | θεᾰ́εσθον | θεᾰόμεθᾰ | θεᾰ́εσθε | θεᾰ́ονται | ||||
| subjunctive | θεᾰ́ωμαι | θεᾰ́ῃ | θεᾰ́ηται | θεᾰ́ησθον | θεᾰ́ησθον | θεᾰώμεθᾰ | θεᾰ́ησθε | θεᾰ́ωνται | |||||
| optative | θεᾰοίμην | θεᾰ́οιο | θεᾰ́οιτο | θεᾰ́οισθον | θεᾰοίσθην | θεᾰοίμεθᾰ | θεᾰ́οισθε | θεᾰ́οιντο | |||||
| imperative | θεᾰ́ου | θεᾰέσθω | θεᾰ́εσθον | θεᾰέσθων | θεᾰ́εσθε | θεᾰέσθων | |||||||
| infinitive | θεᾰ́εσθαι | ||||||||||||
| participle | m | θεᾰόμενος | |||||||||||
| f | θεᾰομένη | ||||||||||||
| n | θεᾰόμενον | ||||||||||||
| Notes: | This table gives Attic inflectional endings. For conjugation in dialects other than Attic, see Appendix:Ancient Greek dialectal conjugation.
| ||||||||||||
| number | singular | dual | plural | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| first | second | third | second | third | first | second | third | ||||||
| middle | indicative | θεῶμαι | θεᾷ | θεᾶται | θεᾶσθον | θεᾶσθον | θεώμεθᾰ | θεᾶσθε | θεῶνται | ||||
| subjunctive | θεῶμαι | θεᾷ | θεᾶται | θεᾶσθον | θεᾶσθον | θεώμεθᾰ | θεᾶσθε | θεῶνται | |||||
| optative | θεῴμην | θεῷο | θεῷτο | θεῷσθον | θεῴσθην | θεῴμεθᾰ | θεῷσθε | θεῷντο | |||||
| imperative | θεῶ | θεᾱ́σθω | θεᾶσθον | θεᾱ́σθων | θεᾶσθε | θεᾱ́σθων | |||||||
| infinitive | θεᾶσθαι | ||||||||||||
| participle | m | θεώμενος | |||||||||||
| f | θεωμένη | ||||||||||||
| n | θεώμενον | ||||||||||||
| Notes: | This table gives Attic inflectional endings. For conjugation in dialects other than Attic, see Appendix:Ancient Greek dialectal conjugation.
| ||||||||||||
— Eru·tuon 18:54, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
The aorist active infinitive of κωλύω (kōlúō) should have a circumflex accent over the 2nd syllable in the stem κωλῦσαι, rather than the spurious form listed with an accute accent over the first syllable (*κώλῡσαι).
{{grc-conj-aorist-1|ἐκώλῡσ|ἐκωλύσ|ἐκωλῡσ|κωλύσ|κωλῡσ|κώλῡσ|ἐκωλύθ|ἐκωλῡθ|κωλῡθ|κωλύθ|PC2S=κωλύθητῐ}}
When |dial=epi is set, the first-person plural middle ending (all tenses except perfect) shows up as "με(σ)θᾰ(σ)θᾰ" instead of "με(σ)θᾰ", and the link doesn't behave as desired. For example, at ἔδω, the first-person plural middle active indicative displays as "ἐδόμε(σ)θᾰ(σ)θᾰ" and links thus: ](])]. Instead, it should display as "ἐδόμε(σ)θᾰ" and link as ](])]. Can anyone fix this? It seems to be happening in the "-- Epic forms (not in Buck)" section of the main Module:grc-conj page (not the /data subpage, surprisingly enough), but I don't understand Lua so I can't fix it myself. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 08:52, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Perfect infinitives for middle/passive should have an acute accent on the penultimate syllable, yet the inflection templates create an acute in antepenultima position. AFAICT, the bug bites for every verb.
Example: For the verb φέρω, the template produces ἐνήνεχθαι but the correct form is ἐνηνέχθαι.
27.34.20.142 22:09, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Why there isn't this -έτωσαν form, but only -όντων? Sorry, I can't add it by myself. Дитмар (talk) 15:27, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
To make them one by one is too bothersome. I'd appreciate if you could meliorate.--Yoshiciv (talk) 08:25, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Bonjour,
Je ne suis pas un expert du grec mais, lorsque j’utilise le modèle {{grc-conj|fut-ln|ἀγγελ|ἀγγελθ|dial=att}}, j’obtiens deux conjuguaisons toutes deux indiquées non contractées :
, alors que la deuxième, ἀγγελῶ, me semble au contraire contractée. N’est-ce pas une coquille ?
Bon courage ! :-) 2A01:CB00:796:3C00:B5F1:97F4:6414:E50A 18:22, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
P.-S. : Je pense que ce problème est similaire à celui signalé par Eru·tuon le 2 Mars 2017 : Module_talk:grc-conj#Dialect_parameter 2A01:CB00:796:3C00:B5F1:97F4:6414:E50A 19:01, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Regarding ε-contracted verbs, Smyth § 397 only mentions that ε + ο and ε + ω aren't contracted and the module currently reflects that, but @Sarri.greek alerted me to the fact that ε + η and ε + ῃ aren't contracted either. On Greek Wikisource, of several pairs of contracted and uncontracted forms (for instance, ῥῇ and ῥέῃ, δῆται and δέηται) that I searched for, only the uncontracted version can be found. So Smyth seems to have forgotten to mention that ε + η and ε + ῃ aren't contracted, or maybe he mentions it somewhere else. Anyway, I think I will try to change the behavior of the pres-con-e-mono conjugation type to reflect this, though it would be nice to get confirmation. — Eru·tuon 23:31, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
@Erutuon: {{grc-conj|imperf-con-e|...|dial=epi}} provides both contracted and uncontracted forms, but both sets are labeled "uncontracted". See ὠθέω for an example: the fourth Imperfect table is titled "Imperfect: ὤθευν, ὠθεύμην (Uncontracted)", but ὤθευν and ὠθεύμην (and all the rest of the forms in the table) are actually contracted. —Mahāgaja · talk 20:36, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
@Erutuon: at κορύσσω (korússō) it is necessary to manually specify the mediopassive perfect participle κεκορυθμένος (kekoruthménos) because the usual -θμ- > -σμ- rule doesn't apply. However, the periphrastic subjunctive and optative forms, which are built on this participle, still show the automatically generated *κεκορυσμένος (*kekorusménos). Would it be possible to get them to use the manually specified participle wherever one is given? Thanks! —Mahāgaja · talk 10:39, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Mένος *ὦ in Module:grc-conj/data, where M stands for the perfect passive stem plus μ; not sure what * means.) It would also be great to generate the feminine and neuter forms of participles from the masculine rather than separately (see Mένη and Mένον in Module:grc-conj/data) so that only the masculine has to be supplied in κορύσσω (korússō). I already have code that can do that in Module:User:Erutuon/grc (get_participle_information). — Eru·tuon 17:40, 22 October 2019 (UTC)@Erutuon: Any idea why the manual override isn't working at ἧμαι? For the pluperfect, I've added |PI3S=ἧστο, but the table still has ἧτο. —Mahāgaja · talk 11:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
|MI3S=ἧστο and call it a middle form. —Mahāgaja · talk 12:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
@Erutuon: Any idea why there is a stray "Î" at ἀλέομαι in the table "Present: ἀλεῦμαι (Uncontracted)" in the third-person plural middle optative? —Mahāgaja · talk 17:31, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
As per the grammar of Michalis Oikonomou:
(I will use the verb λύω for the examples provided, as he does)
the most usual form of conjugating the active perfect subjunctive/optative/imperative was periphrastically:
λελυκὼς-κυῖα-κὸς ὦ ᾖς ᾖ
λελυκότες-κυῖαι-κότα ὦμεν ἦτε ὦσι
λελυκότε-κυία-κότε ἦτον
λελυκὼς-κυῖα-κὸς εἴην εἴης εἴη
λελυκότες-κυῖαι-κότα εἴημεν/εἶμεν εἴητε/εἶτε εἴησαν/εἶεν
λελυκότε-κυία-κότε εἴητον/εἶτον εἰήτην/εἴτην
λελυκὼς-κυῖα-κὸς ἴσθι ἔστω
λελυκότες-κυῖαι-κότα ἔστε ἔστων/ἔστωσαν/ὄντων
λελυκότε-κυία-κότε ἔστον ἔστων
When it comes to the active imperative, the monolectic forms are almost never used. For the pluperfect, while the archaic forms
ἐλελύκη(ν) ἐλελύκης
do appear, without the nu for the first person, the 3rd singular does not (ἐλελύκη). The later forms
ἐλελύκειμεν ἐλελύκειτε ἐλελύκεισαν
are also absent. There also does exist a periphrastic imperative for the middle voice, but it is not used much, so it isn't very crucial that it be added. --PastelKos (talk) 13:37, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Also, the 3rd plural middle indicative perfect and pluperfect for verbs that do not end in a vowel is formed almost always periphrastically:
πράττω: πεπραγμένοι εἰσί, πεπραγμένοι ἦσαν
γράφω: γεγραμμένοι εἰσί, γεγραμμένοι ἦσαν
πείθω: πεπεισμένοι εἰσί, πεπεισμένοι ἦσαν
--PastelKos (talk) 13:42, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
@sarri.greek: About this edit, there is a table showing the hypothetical uncontracted forms of δηλόω (dēlóō) in Appendix:Ancient Greek grammar tables#Verbs in -όω. In general entries should show forms that are attested or possible.
As I understand it, we don't include uncontracted present and imperfect forms of δηλόω (dēlóō) or other -όω verbs because they aren't attested; they are only the hypothetical ancestors of the Attic and Ionic forms. (All but the Ionic table in Appendix:Ancient Greek contraction show ο contracting with the following vowel. Not sure if that means Ionic doesn't contract in those cases, or that there aren't examples of vowel combinations starting with ο.) I thought I had edited the module to remove the table of uncontracted -όω forms, but it doesn't seem to have ever been there. I visited the history, clicked on some of the old revisions of the module, edited each one, and did "preview page with template" putting in δηλόω in the box, but only saw the contracted tables.
We should only include tables and entries for uncontracted forms when a particular Greek dialect had that word and the form is actually attested or is theoretically possible in that dialect. I guess -όω verbs never have uncontracted forms (and they might be an Attic and Ionic category only), but -έω verbs could have uncontracted forms in particular dialects. If they were not attested in such dialects, we can only show contracted forms; for instance, if I remember correctly ἀγαθοποιέω (agathopoiéō) is a verb first attested in Koine Greek; the form ἀγαθοποιέει (agathopoiéei) did not exist and should not be shown in a table and should not have an entry. It currently does have an entry because a well-meaning editor created a lot of lemma forms for all forms that were listed in the conjugation tables of some verbs at the time. I've since removed the uncontracted table, but not yet deleted the entries for the unattested verb forms.
It is unfortunate that our lemma is the first-person singular present indicative, because it means that we have to put the entry at an uncontracted form that did not exist in Attic and sometimes did not exist in any dialect. *ποιέω is an Ionic form, *δηλόω is nonexistent, *τῑμάω might have been unattested completely, or attested in some obscure dialect because the tables in Appendix:Ancient Greek contraction show αω contracting to ω everywhere. If we had the entries at τῑμῶ (tīmô), ποιῶ (poiô), δηλῶ (dēlô) we wouldn't be able to tell apart the main contraction types, but if the lemmas were τῑμᾶν, ποιεῖν, δηλοῦν, we would be using attested forms and the contraction types would have different endings. Sometimes a verb simply wasn't used in a non-contracting dialect, like ἀγαθοποιέω (agathopoiéō). Also sometimes dialects have a combination of uncontracted and contracted forms, or contracted forms that are different from the Attic forms or uncontracted forms that are different from the hypothetical precursors to the Attic forms.
I'm not very familiar with analogues of Attic contracted verbs outside of Attic and Ionic, so I might have gotten some of this wrong, but hopefully it is mostly correct. — Eru·tuon 21:17, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
There seem to be a lot of cases where wiktionary entries use conjugation types like aor-ami for thematic verbs, but "ami" is documented as being for athematic verbs with an underlying α, such as ἵστημι. An example of this is in the entry for οὐτάω, which has { { grc-conj|aor-ami|οὐτ|οὐτ|AI3S=οὖτᾰ|dial=epi } }. It seems like this is being used to make a second aorist for this verb. Is this a kludge that just takes advantage of the fact that it gives the right endings? --2607:FB91:1B9C:13B4:B8F3:A642:EA80:A550 18:43, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
I believe Laconian infinitives are supposed to end in -ην ( https://en.wiktionary.orghttps://dictious.com/en/Appendix:Ancient_Greek_dialectal_conjugation#Infinitive ). The following template coding currently generates πᾰ́σχεν:
| number | singular | dual | plural | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| first | second | third | second | third | first | second | third | ||||||
| active | indicative | πᾰ́σχω | πᾰ́σχεις | πᾰ́σχει | πᾰ́σχετον | πᾰ́σχετον | πᾰ́σχομες | πᾰ́σχετε | πᾰ́σχοντῐ | ||||
| subjunctive | πᾰ́σχω | πᾰ́σχῃς | πᾰ́σχῃ | πᾰ́σχητον | πᾰ́σχητον | πᾰ́σχωμες | πᾰ́σχητε | πᾰ́σχωντῐ | |||||
| optative | πᾰ́σχοιμῐ | πᾰ́σχοις | πᾰ́σχοι | πᾰ́σχοιτον | πᾰσχοίτᾱν | πᾰ́σχοιμες | πᾰ́σχοιτε | πᾰ́σχοιεν | |||||
| imperative | πᾰ́σχε | πᾰσχέτω | πᾰ́σχετον | πᾰσχέτων | πᾰ́σχετε | πᾰσχόντω | |||||||
| active | |||||||||||||
| infinitive | πᾰ́σχην | ||||||||||||
| participle | m | πᾰ́σχων | |||||||||||
| f | πᾰσχῶσᾰ | ||||||||||||
| n | πᾰ́σχον | ||||||||||||
| Notes: | Dialects other than Attic are not well attested. Some forms are based on conjecture. Use with caution. For more details, see Appendix:Ancient Greek dialectal conjugation.
| ||||||||||||
Looking at the Lua code, it seems that the problem is with the following lines in grc-conj.lua:
I think these are in the wrong order. Since Laconian is classified by the code as a type of Doric, the change to -ην in the first line always gets undone, in the case of Laconian, by the third line. The check for Doric should come first.--2603:8000:8900:6E00:7065:6310:2DB0:44FB 23:16, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
I could be misunderstanding this, but it seems like there is a bug in the treatment of Doric. The documentation for what dialects and dialect groups exist seems to be this source code: https://en.wiktionary.orghttps://dictious.com/en/Module:grc:Dialects . (If there is some other documentation besides reading the source, maybe I'm missing it.) Accoding to this, there is supposed to be a three-letter dialect code 'dor' for Doric. However, the code in grc-conj.lua never actually defines any endings for a 'dor' code. There is only a dialect group 'doric'. Here is the relevant line of the source:
So although it seems like we're supposed to have a dialect 'dor', it isn't defined as a member of the Doric group. So I think 'dor' should be added to this list, both to be consistent with the documentation and as an ease of use feature for users. If you look at the two examples below, the first one shows that 'dor' was recognized (as shown in the title), but it gives the standad Attic infinitive rather than the Doric one. The second one uses 'her' for Heraclean, which is a member of the Doric group. It works properly.
| number | singular | dual | plural | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| first | second | third | second | third | first | second | third | ||||||
| active | indicative | πᾰ́σχω | πᾰ́σχεις | πᾰ́σχει | πᾰ́σχετον | πᾰ́σχετον | πᾰ́σχομες | πᾰ́σχετε | πᾰ́σχοντῐ | ||||
| subjunctive | πᾰ́σχω | πᾰ́σχῃς | πᾰ́σχῃ | πᾰ́σχητον | πᾰ́σχητον | πᾰ́σχωμες | πᾰ́σχητε | πᾰ́σχωντῐ | |||||
| optative | πᾰ́σχοιμῐ | πᾰ́σχοις | πᾰ́σχοι | πᾰ́σχοιτον | πᾰσχοίτᾱν | πᾰ́σχοιμες | πᾰ́σχοιτε | πᾰ́σχοιεν | |||||
| imperative | πᾰ́σχε | πᾰσχέτω | πᾰ́σχετον | πᾰσχέτων | πᾰ́σχετε | πᾰσχόντω | |||||||
| active | |||||||||||||
| infinitive | πᾰ́σχεν | ||||||||||||
| participle | m | πᾰ́σχων | |||||||||||
| f | πᾰ́σχουσᾰ | ||||||||||||
| n | πᾰ́σχον | ||||||||||||
| Notes: | Dialects other than Attic are not well attested. Some forms are based on conjecture. Use with caution. For more details, see Appendix:Ancient Greek dialectal conjugation.
| ||||||||||||
| number | singular | dual | plural | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| first | second | third | second | third | first | second | third | ||||||
| active | indicative | πᾰ́σχω | πᾰ́σχεις | πᾰ́σχει | πᾰ́σχετον | πᾰ́σχετον | πᾰ́σχομες | πᾰ́σχετε | πᾰ́σχοντῐ | ||||
| subjunctive | πᾰ́σχω | πᾰ́σχῃς | πᾰ́σχῃ | πᾰ́σχητον | πᾰ́σχητον | πᾰ́σχωμες | πᾰ́σχητε | πᾰ́σχωντῐ | |||||
| optative | πᾰ́σχοιμῐ | πᾰ́σχοις | πᾰ́σχοι | πᾰ́σχοιτον | πᾰσχοίτᾱν | πᾰ́σχοιμες | πᾰ́σχοιτε | πᾰ́σχοιεν | |||||
| imperative | πᾰ́σχε | πᾰσχέτω | πᾰ́σχετον | πᾰσχέτων | πᾰ́σχετε | πᾰσχόντω | |||||||
| active | |||||||||||||
| infinitive | πᾰ́σχεν | ||||||||||||
| participle | m | πᾰ́σχων | |||||||||||
| f | πᾰσχῶσᾰ | ||||||||||||
| n | πᾰ́σχον | ||||||||||||
| Notes: | Dialects other than Attic are not well attested. Some forms are based on conjecture. Use with caution. For more details, see Appendix:Ancient Greek dialectal conjugation.
| ||||||||||||
--Valvecable (talk) 23:29, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
The links in the table need to have accelerated form creation enabled (WT:ACCEL). This was suggested by Vergencescattered in the Discord group. It is probably possible in the current version of the module by setting the accel variable in link_form (which is currently nil so no acceleration is added). link_form would have to translate form_code to get the mood, person, and number labels for {{infl}} (for instance, AI to act|inf) and link_form would need a new parameter for the tense label (pres, aor, etc.). The tense code would be translated from the conjtype (for instance, pres-con-a to pres). I'm not doing this right now, but just writing what I figured out here, because I wrote it on Discord, which is less accessible to editors. — Eru·tuon 19:24, 8 February 2024 (UTC)