Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/teh₂g-. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/teh₂g-, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/teh₂g- in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/teh₂g- you have here. The definition of the word Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/teh₂g- will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofReconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/teh₂g-, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Attempts have been made to connect this set with Proto-Germanic*tēkaną, *takaną(“to touch; to grasp, take”) and Tocharian Btäk-(“to touch, feel (with the hand); to fetch”), ceśäṃ(3sg.pres.), which eo ipso point to Proto-Indo-European *deh₁g- (or *deg-/*dēg-, which would appear to violate the constraint that prohibits PIE roots of the shape *DeD-); the initial stop in Germanic and the vowel in Tocharian preclude any regular derivation from *teh₂g- or *tag-. Hamp, in an effort to explain both problems at once, has suggested a root *teg- as the source of all of these terms, with zero-grade *tₔg-, which he assumes in pre-Germanic assimilated to *dg-, as the source of forms with /a/ (< *).[2] However, this leaves Greek /a/ (zero vowel expected) and the long vowel in Gothic𐍄𐌴𐌺𐌰𐌽(tēkan) unexplained. Mottausch's solution is to assume the reduplicated form *te-th₂g- gave rise to pre-Germanic *te-dg-, with regular deletion of an interconsonantal laryngeal in an unstressed syllable plus voicing assimilation, which was back-formed to *de-dg- to restore normal reduplication (paralleling PIE *píph₃eti > *píbeti > Latinbibit);[3] the Tocharian may tentatively be grouped under the same formation. Per Kortlandt, the Germanic long *ē may thus have developed from dissimilation of this *dedg- to glottalic *deh₁g- (cf. *penkʷe-dḱomt(“fifty”) > *penkʷēḱomt > Ancient Greekπεντήκοντα(pentḗkonta), Sanskritपञ्चाशत्(pañcāśát), Latin quīnquāgintā).[4] Kroonen upholds this derivation although notes the great difficulties involved. For a partial alternative, he suggests a back-formation of *tēkaną from iterative *þakkōną (cf. *slapp/bōną ⇒ *slēpaną).[5] Ringe contends that either pre-Germanic or pre-Tocharian borrowed the word from the other.[6]
↑ 2.02.12.2Adams, Douglas Q. (2013) “täk-”, in A Dictionary of Tocharian B: Revised and Greatly Enlarged (Leiden Studies in Indo-European; 10), Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi, →ISBN, pages 305–306:
It is particularly noteworthy that the long-grade thematic present formation (like those seen in klyaus-, klep- or tänk-, qq.v.) of TchB is exactly matched by Gothic tēkan and the (PIE) o-grade present (Tocharian subjunctive) is exactly matched by Old Norse taka.
↑ 5.05.1Guus Kroonen (2013) “*takan- ~ *tēkan-”, in Alexander Lubotsky, editor, Etymological Dictionary of Proto-Germanic (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series; 11), Leiden, Boston: Brill, →ISBN, page 507: “The Germanic strong verb is clearly derived from PIE *teh₂g-, but the development of this root into *takan- and *tēkan- is not straightforward. […]”
^ Ringe, Don (1988–1990) “Evidence for the Position of Tocharian in the Indo-European Family?”, in Sprache, volume 34, published 1991, page 105-15 of 59–123
↑ 7.07.17.2De Vaan, Michiel (2008) “tangō, -ere”, in Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the other Italic Languages (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series; 7), Leiden, Boston: Brill, →ISBN, pages 606–607: “PIE pr. *th₂-n-g- ‘to touch’”
^ Guus Kroonen (2013) “*þak(k)ōn-”, in Alexander Lubotsky, editor, Etymological Dictionary of Proto-Germanic (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series; 11), Leiden, Boston: Brill, →ISBN, page 532: “*th₂g-néh₂- (IE)”
In view of reflexes which show a short vowel /a/, LIV prefers a reconstruction with the marginal, controversial phoneme *a.[2] Beekes finds no issue with *teh₂g-, so long as the Old Persian descendant lost its laryngeal due to Lubotsky's law in Indo-Iranian (*HDC > *DC).[1] Both sources agree however that the long vowel in Ancient Greekτᾱγός(tāgós) is unexpected.
Perhaps originally the same root as *teh₂g-(“to touch”). (See the meanings of Latin taxō(“to touch > to estimate, reckon”), and for a parallel semantic development compare Proto-Indo-European *tek-(“to take, receive”) > Proto-Indo-Iranian*kšáyati(“to have control, rule”).)
^ Adams, Douglas Q. (2013) “tāś”, in A Dictionary of Tocharian B: Revised and Greatly Enlarged (Leiden Studies in Indo-European; 10), Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi, →ISBN, page 304: “PIE *tāgyu-”