User:Sobreira/PIE

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word User:Sobreira/PIE. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word User:Sobreira/PIE, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say User:Sobreira/PIE in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word User:Sobreira/PIE you have here. The definition of the word User:Sobreira/PIE will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofUser:Sobreira/PIE, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Navegar

E gl en fr de it an nl pt mwl es
D gl en fr de it an nl pt mwl es
F gl en mwl
L gl mwl

This is the personal page of a User in the English Wiktionary. If you are looking for the definition of the tree, please see sobreira.

Shortcut:
WT:EL

Subpages of INE-PRO

ḱǵʷʰ₁₂₃l̥m̥n̥r̥āēīōū<ḗ ṓ ā́ ī́ ū́-ĺ̥ḿ̥ń̥ŕ̥<<ə-k̂k̑ĝ

sources

I have been thinking all day about this topics (9-10 forms and variants for one concept!) and I have ended up realising that due to
1) my lack of knowledge on PIE evolutions
2) the lack of consensus on PIE as I understand (I have just read about the Leiden vs. Beekes conjugation, not to mention the glottalic theory) and
3) the lack of material at my disposal (not to mention Pokorny is not legitimate any more);

then I have to give up on doing anything systematic about Appendix:List of Proto-Indo-European roots, and even less about nominals/verbs. Unless you all feel I could be entitled to protract all the conflicting variants and intermediate etyms to the ultimate root, I have to desist. I am quite unsure and picky on this topic, and meticulous, systematic and think very theorically in general, so if I don't do it that way then I don't feel comfortable. I will indeed try to state the etymologies for the GL words I meet following the simple pattern GL<LA<PIE (starting from PIE, not from GL), so I will probably go through all of them, or at least try a few of them. I will rely only on the few modern available materials I found or could find that I think worth it (if you know any other, please let me know):

list

  • GENERIC for LA>PIE on the net:
  • GENERIC for LA>PIE on book: unless (until) I buy or get the
  • SPECIFIC for GL>LA on book: 4 Galician
  • (Ir Indo/Estraviz/SéculoXXI/GDXeraisL) and 1 Portuguese
  • Houaiss general dictionaries stating etymology) and try to source my edits.
Of course I will try to leave track of my search on User:Sobreira/*pele- and so on (including all of them in upcoming User:Sobreira/PIE), to save time and work in case anyone with knowledge enough engage in the task of uniformizing the chaos. In that case, I would appreciate the courtesy of being warned. Thanks all for the recommendations, knowledge shared, respectful and patient treatment and time.
  • And because all of this, I think we should consider seriously the proposal of transclusion I said above, or some other way of solving this problem. Sobreira (talk) 17:53, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
I've digitized for my own research use a list of all roots in {{R:ine:LIV}} some time ago; I'd still need to verify it against Kümmel's online repository of

to do


As cores do sol: Colours in PIE

User:Sobreira/PIE-appendices and categories

to do2

  1. create in Category:Proto-Indo-European terms by PIE root
  2. insert { {PIE root see}} in root
  3. insert in derived { {PIE word}}, but they won't let me

also:

Policies

  • Not reconstruct when descendants in only one language? No, redirections.
  • Simply Alternative forms with only one

Everything You Always Wanted to Know About PIE (*But Were Afraid to Ask)

Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia