Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
Wiktionary:Etymology scriptorium/2024/December. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
Wiktionary:Etymology scriptorium/2024/December, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
Wiktionary:Etymology scriptorium/2024/December in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
Wiktionary:Etymology scriptorium/2024/December you have here. The definition of the word
Wiktionary:Etymology scriptorium/2024/December will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
Wiktionary:Etymology scriptorium/2024/December, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
The redirect doesn't make sense at all, and is clearly vandalism by a currently blocked user. However, even though I'm not a Dravidianist, I question the reconstruction itself: Neither Reconstruction:Proto-Dravidian/cinkiwēr nor Reconstruction:Proto-South Dravidian/cinkiwēr seems to be a plausible reconstruction, given that Old Tamil 𑀇𑀜𑁆𑀘𑀺𑀯𑁂𑀭𑁆 (iñcivēr) seems to be a compound inside Old Tamil, and 𑀇𑀜𑁆𑀘𑀺 (iñci) a loanword (even if Old Tamil is apparently not the direct source of Sauraseni Prakrit 𑀲𑀺𑀁𑀕𑀺𑀯𑁂𑀭 (siṃgivera)). --Florian Blaschke (talk) 18:03, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
According to the Proto-Germanic pages these are not related. tbf the derivation of *egalaz is phonologically uncertain. Suryaratha03 (talk) 23:17, 2 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Here is a source, but the page for 'egel' has a more recent source which doesn't seem so sure about the connection. Kluge says the origin of Egel is unclear. Exarchus (talk) 12:02, 3 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Proto-Indo-European *h₁eǵʰis says: "Related to *h₂éngʷʰis and *h₁ógʷʰis." Seems debatable/dubious... Exarchus (talk) 12:39, 3 December 2024 (UTC)Reply