shown <span class="searchmatch">to</span> be attested. <span class="searchmatch">Terms</span> which have not yet been <span class="searchmatch">checked</span> are at Appendix talk:<span class="searchmatch">Terms</span> <span class="searchmatch">considered</span> <span class="searchmatch">difficult</span> <span class="searchmatch">or</span> <span class="searchmatch">impossible</span> <span class="searchmatch">to</span> <span class="searchmatch">translate</span> <span class="searchmatch">into</span> <span class="searchmatch">English</span>/Candidates...
<span class="searchmatch">Terms</span> which have been <span class="searchmatch">checked</span> and included in <span class="searchmatch">or</span> excluded from Appendix:<span class="searchmatch">Terms</span> <span class="searchmatch">considered</span> <span class="searchmatch">difficult</span> <span class="searchmatch">or</span> <span class="searchmatch">impossible</span> <span class="searchmatch">to</span> <span class="searchmatch">translate</span> <span class="searchmatch">into</span> <span class="searchmatch">English</span> are at Appendix...
15:11, 5 June 2013 (UTC) The term '<span class="searchmatch">considered</span>' bothers me; what if one author considers a word <span class="searchmatch">impossible</span> <span class="searchmatch">to</span> <span class="searchmatch">translate</span> but others don't? The way I interpret...
about <span class="searchmatch">to</span> agree with removing the two <span class="searchmatch">ŏr</span> rows, and dispersing the class of words which have this distribution (sorrow, orange, horror, etc) <span class="searchmatch">into</span> the other...
hardware and software limitations that made the original scripts very <span class="searchmatch">difficult</span> <span class="searchmatch">or</span> <span class="searchmatch">impossible</span>. —Stephen 11:36, 20 May 2007 (UTC) I know that, and that is a huge...